My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/22/1966 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1966
>
1966 Planning Commission
>
02/22/1966 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:39 PM
Creation date
1/31/2019 9:21:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1966
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/22/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? '. <br />??bru?? 22, 1966 . - Page 8 <br />,,? ??tablished by ccuncilo <br />Ifta Musial indicat?ed lurthex a desizc? ?? se????BLY con= <br />sider tfl?? ???ying c?? ?tili????? md a,-utaa??iv? dLscu?sLcr?? 9?,asuec? <br />?Lth Mr. Spalc??? ????aLnLng. to the Yjemb???s his mpenLez,,ce and <br />undc???tandLng md knawIN,dge of thc? su'Doject? ?ader «,Lec?lissLono <br />Di????si?? was fuxtP???? had °uy the Men???? ?? tO the Prus <br />and con? ?f havis?? ?ndergro-und utilities as oppo?eua tu ?\vAaTm . <br />hcead9 it was t.,e consen???? ?? ?pinio? ?hat, thc Xcambs??s would. <br />?e m??e i??limed ?o heve undlc??????? ?tiUs?y'U???? than ov??? <br />?ead `?ec:ause of. the esthetic? ?aluesa ecJnomiGN- 9 in the over- <br />all picturea ?? ????raa . <br />Mro M???al moved tIl?? ???????gation of un<?,?xgT??nand <br />-ut?ility ???vices to subdi??sior?s bc? ???er?ed tu a Cc??mmittee9 <br />sec????ed bg? ?ai?an.Prokasyo Rr??? call an. the irt?????lon ??s <br />hado ???? ? ??sial9 ????za9 Prokasya Eagara Foxda S., ;alc?ing <br />and Fabske Comitte was c???riap-d of Chai=? -Fro'!'?.asy ?a?d <br />Mro Musialo <br />Re???? ? ?oning Coc?? ??? givem by Mre ??al?'Ing <br />? (attached)o Mra Ford inc??cated9 because o? the coWlexity of the <br />.subjecta ???? ????? sh?ld ?? ? ??paratc? ?????? ?i.th rep <br />gard to this so ??? ?? ??ther cansidaT and, studly Lta <br />Mr. Spalding statec? the reason fog the report e??? ?? <br />el?atnate the poss?,bib?,ty of ?.e c?oa?st?ic?t?,on of A Tes?,c?er?ce <br />?in a di??ri?? ? cl????ficati? adjacamt to a distxic? A Lrc?si? <br />?????aL areao The proposab ??? ????? ?? ? ?ide linc? ??r <br />the Law Direc??? ?hich coubd be amended in acc???dancc? with <br />the Law Director° s thinkingo <br />Mra Spalc??? ?tatec? tha? ??si?al?y W-hat ths. plaminffi <br />Comission hac? in i?? mind was to c???inate thc? ? ????gOT Y <br />£?om apa????? ??nimg ox retai1. ?oni?? ?r any othc?? type o? <br />? ?ningo <br />" Th??? ?eing no ??th?? ??siness to come bc????? thc? <br />Pl??? Commissi?? ??tion for adjc?rnment? wa? madc? ?? <br />?airman Prokasy9 secondec? ?? Mre Esgaro ?????? ??? ?o a <br />votee yeas°e Ma?sial,, LaPonza9 Pxokasya Hsgara Fabaka Ford <br />and S?aldingo Mee??g adjourned at 10o38 ae3uck- pome <br />James A. Prokasy9 Cha?zv= Thc??s M. Fabekg Seagetary
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.