My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/08/1966 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1966
>
1966 Planning Commission
>
03/08/1966 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:39 PM
Creation date
1/31/2019 9:22:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1966
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/8/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ma?ch 8, 1966 m Page 5 <br />pbatso Mre Kan????? ?????? ?hat thed,? ????re doin? this, b???t wh«n <br />'builders c-ame in with c????per kr???? ???ansa fi;hey rec???ivec? varianc??? <br />?? 35 feet £rbn? ?? ??ac?? ?nd ???e instruc,,tce:c? ??ot to put the frant <br />?uilding setba?k l??? and have i? ??cord?d a? such 1?????use it m;?cc?e <br />it mr???e di?fL?ult to rc?????? ??? setbac?k line and .?ive consid??atiu?? <br />??? ? ?????nceo <br />Chaa?rman Prokas;? inc??catec? ?ha? th?? ???? onlce3' ?tth 60fast <br />lots an<c? ?ha? ??e d??elop??s woul? ? ??? ?avre, pr(o1? ?ems" WL'f'h B"A" ?r <br />"BBb lotse Mra Ford mac?? the motion r???? the developer cume bac:? <br />with ?lans sh??wing the ?ecommenc????ions od? ??e Plann?? Commi?sior?? <br />sp???fi?ally o.f p??viding a sc?cond accass un Dover Road; seconded <br />by Mro LaPo1CIlzam Roll call on thernatiofl$; yeas9 Sps`3.1ldW?,,LaPonQ, <br />Prok'???? ???d and FabeJLGe <br />Ch??rman Pro?.c??? then revived the disc????on on. Sanc?? Subm. <br />c?ivision #!?, I?dicat3a?? ?? ?? ???? En????r he had alreac?? ?lad <br />his letter, but that Mro F?rd had sc??e quc???ionse <br />Mre Forr? ?????? <br />??? ??????k lines that <br />OT plots they snow the <br />Mtm ??nareff r?gardin? <br />?r not there was stil? <br />type of hou??? wou1? ?? <br />??? ???? ??causc? ?? the diffic?ul?y in readi;rg? <br />the developer i?clude unc??? subdivisi?? lo?? <br />??????k linese Mrm Forc? al?? ???ried <br />the 10????? waal,?way9 inquis?ing a? ?? wh?ther <br />?????????? ??? ?ora d????wayg asking what <br />buibt adja???? ??? the ???semente <br />Mre Kanateff Tndicated therc? hac? ??en n? ????? ?adea 1??? ?t <br />was hi? ?pinion th?? ?ould p??? the ?ri?????? ??? ?????site sides tc? <br />???? ??? ????????? ??????? ???? ??? ?????????? ?ra?fice ?? indi- <br />catec? tha? a nurmal size hduse could L,? bu??? th?re becausc? ??? was <br />tk?? ???imum setback. on the side yarda indi?????? ????? ????? ?? ?? <br />???? ??????? ?????s at that pointe <br />Oxa Subbot 207a Nrm mrd inc?ui??? ?? ?? ??? ther tk???e would <br />be su??ficient c????an?? ?ack to Aot 207 :???? ??? back endo Mro Kanar- <br />aff indir????d that it was normal ?hat theq ?????? the setback l???? <br />?? ?? ??et and H?a?? take abv?t anc ????? 50 feet ica? the depth of the <br />house sc? ?ha? ??? builder cculc? ????truc?? ????? ??thou1? ???taini?g <br />a ??ri???? on tY?? stanc???? ??e homnsee <br />?? ?dicatec? that aA?th?,?ugh it ffi???s all the requiren????? ?? <br />the Citya ???? ??? ?o make c????ai? ??e Nuilder had 70 fc??? ?? ??? <br />???? ?f the housem Mro La??? ? Ci?? Engineer9 •????????? ???? ???? <br />????????? ??????? ???? ir??? ???? ?? ??? ??? the ???rn??? ?? the ???? <br />?????ion and for M?,?o Kanareff t,? sh?? thisa Mro La???s indic atid <br />that h? ??ulc? be in a position to appro•??? the pl?? ?hi? ??ening.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.