Laserfiche WebLink
--qw- <br />April 12, 1966 - PaQF 2 <br />the developers to contact ttte property owners anutti.n;5 the subject <br />property to 500 feetaway in all c]i_rtertj.onS wit_n a pet?tion, after <br />? which iC would be cansidered bv t:he ti,?). P1?-_innf.ng Cacn?-?iission. <br />Questioning of Mr. Lahas, City EnSincer, reve31Ed thaL from <br />i his conversation with the Ohio State Hi.ghwa_y nepartmenr i.t was in-- <br />dicated to him thaf, one, there was a?,ood a:)ssihility 'Lhey t?uuld <br />build a bridge at I-80 and 'csz-c>t)kparr. ho?tu raLl)er thu? a:.arr.p ;- <br />ing down to the south. He icldic.ar.ed it was a small Iactcr in con- <br />sideration, and even if the ramp were built iL wauld oniy take a <br />small corner of the subject property and wouldn't a£Lect the psr- <br />cel to a large extent. <br />With regard zo the question of thQ Sat12 L,SLy sewer --- this <br />was built a few years ago and it is eis;ht incne5 and was c:;nstru:-- <br />ted so as to accommodate t;,e ared as zoned at t!iat Llcne. 1:: the. <br />area wer.e rezoned, the addi.tional ilow addeci would have a minirnal <br />effect on the system. <br />Motion was then made by rtr. Ford to ho1d t_t:e Kan Yarus <br />proposal in committee and a letter bE sent to Conncil reouescing <br />a 30-day extension; seconded by Mr. LaP;_)nza. Motiori put to a <br />vote; yeas, Musial, LaPonza, Prakasy, Ford and Esgar. <br />? <br />(c) Phillip Engoglia Subi.divison #2 <br />After informing the Com;nission that contact was Made with <br />Mr. Spilberg of the Nighway Dapartment and being advised by rim <br />that he could make no observation or comment until he had seen <br />the plans, Mr. Esgar moved t.hat the matter be held in Ccnciittee <br />and a letter send to Council requesting a 30-day excension; seconded <br />by Mr. ylusial. riotion put= Lo a vate; yeas, Musial, LaPona, Prolcasy9 <br />Ford and Esgax. <br />IV New Uevelopment and Subdivision <br />(a) Mrs. Srail <br />Due to the absence of Mrs. Srail, Chairman Prokasy moved <br />thaz the subject be withdrawn trom the agenda because oE the ap-- <br />parent inability on the part of Mrs. Srail to conform to the Code <br />and the suggestions by the Chairinan; seconded by Mr. Forda Motion <br />put to a vote ; yeas, Musial, I,aPonza, Prokasyp Foi-d and Esgar. <br />(b) Meciical Realty Inc. <br /> <br />Presentation was made by Mr. Shoup, Attorney for Medical <br />Realty Inc., assisted by Mr. Koster, Architect. <br />Chaigman Pr.ok,asy moved that the matter be put inta Committee <br />.