My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/24/1966 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1966
>
1966 Planning Commission
>
05/24/1966 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:41 PM
Creation date
1/31/2019 9:24:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1966
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
5/24/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CHU -of <br />May 24, 1966 - page 6 <br />subject property is bounded by ;tearns ard Cyprus Drive and the <br />township line to the soutb. The developer agreed to make all <br />the chatIges the Committee sugges±ed, which includeq a temporary <br />cul-de-sac at the north end of Kevin Drive, and have the block <br />reserve? for sanitary sewer easement and would became a part <br />of Sublot 27, and tllqt Block A and Block B almost at the township <br />line would become a part of lots 15 and 16 if the developer was <br />not able to turn both of these blocks into developmentable sublots <br />by June 1, 1971, in other words giving him five years to make 4 <br />decent lot of it; otberwise, the property would revert to the <br />adjacent properties, making them approximately 89 ,feet frontage. <br />He i.s also asked to show the setback line on eac? ppqgerty, <br />The developer being not presept at the meetirl,g a1411til be <br />subniits the revised drawing, it was ?elt that notb?h? more'qould <br />be done and it was recommended to be kegt in Corrunittoe, <br />(d) Sandy Ridge #5 <br />Mr. Spalding indicated that Mr. DiBendetto has 4q?eed to <br />withdraw his request for Sapdy Ridge #5'for the ti;e beTrigt <br />.. <br />(e) Ordinance No. 65-104 <br />The Planning Commission was iD receipt of the coMpanion <br />Ordinance No. ?6-121 at this meeting and Mr; Fabek'moved that <br />tYie two be put into a Co;nmittee cor}sisting of James' PrQkasy for <br />study and evaluat?op until the nex? Meeting; Seconap? by <br />Mr. Spalding. MotioTi put to a vote; yeas, I,aPQ6FabQkl 5p4JqJp& <br />and Ford. ' <br />IV New Developmepts an(? Subdivi,$ions <br />(a) Jghn W. Lekas <br />Motioq made by Mr. LaPonza to put this in coT}M#teez seconded <br />by, Mr. Spaldixig ; yeas, LaPopza, F'abQk, Spaldipg, 'and Fprd, Tt Wap <br />aSsigned to a qQmmittee consisting of Messrs. Sp?T#r1g an4 Fabeko <br />Mr: and Mrs. William E1liott stated tkleir situatf,Q?i witb rsspQct <br />to this parcel. T?ey lrye at 3641 Columbia Road, Tel, 777-0197, <br />They indioatpd they orig-inaTly had an option to buy a pqrtiop pf <br />this parcel and wa?; never contacted by the owner, thereby creating <br />prpblems for tbem. <br />(b)(Karl Kiesel Co.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.