My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/26/1966 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1966
>
1966 Planning Commission
>
07/26/1966 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:42 PM
Creation date
1/31/2019 9:26:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1966
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
7/26/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
l <br />11 <br />m ? <br />? <br />Ju1Sr 269 1966 .- p4ge 2 <br />IV New Devplppments and 5ubdirrjsions <br />V Commupicaicions <br />Request addressed to Ci'cy Counail by Great <br />Northern Deve?opers for Qa5pment an Great Northern <br />Boulevard was reado AftQr a shQr'c discussion9 <br />it was mouep Oy Mro LaPor}za and seconded by Mro <br />Spalding that tY}e request be made the subject of <br />furt?pr stud,y ar}d be put Yn CommitteeP Ayes; <br />Spa,lqing., Fords LaFaz4za, FabeX and Prokasy o <br />i=& ter dated July 11, 1966 from Law Director <br />to Colu bia Lar.id Development Oamparny?reado <br />Letten dgted Ju1y 219 1966 frpm Clerk of <br />Counsel read 4 relative to Ordinance No 0 66,197, <br />amend?.ng Chapter XXK 1151 and-Ordinance 1Vo 0 66-200 <br />re sInzle resir3ent A to Multiple Residence fox° the <br />Claybpursne Greens deve].opmenic o Mot$on made by <br />Mr4 Spalding to,eject Ord3nance 66-200aseconded by <br />Chairrman Ppqka$y9 ayes9 Prokasy and Spald3ng; nayes, <br />Fabek, LaPonza and Fordo Motipr} defeateda Refer <br />back to council. <br />vI Cpmmittee Reports <br />(a) iEp 0rd3nanc? <br />_Mr q Spa1din reported that he met ur3th the Camfnis-, <br />sioner of Buildin? ano ._? a1l of his opinions relative <br />to the OvdinanGe and suggested a ,rev3ew of the total <br />omciinancse beaa4se of some conf usion In terminology plus <br />the arqenqmen?s yvhich were being thaught of as a supple- <br />ment't <br />..o Qr° f°r°om the ather ordinapces under r°evieur, <br />The Commit,tee is not prepared at this t3me to r°ender a <br />f'ina1 recommendat3on because of It5 cemplexityo <br />A short discussIon was had relat3.ve to the prob'lem <br />stlll ?xist3.ng with the 5chool Board over the plans.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.