My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/11/1966 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1966
>
1966 Planning Commission
>
10/11/1966 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:42 PM
Creation date
1/31/2019 9:27:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1966
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/11/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
??fu of ?farfh M1w????? ??-?? <br />e-" <br />October 11, 1966 - Page 2 <br />in two or thr9ee weeks a Mre Esgax, made a motion9 seconded <br />by Mro Musial to hold the subdivisZOn in committee ttntil <br />the bounds of I-80 are determineda Ayes9 Ford9 Esgar, <br />Musial, LaPonza and Prokasy, <br />(b ) Lorain Mutual Inlrestmer?'c <br />Mro Musial stated that the developer was on vacation <br />and that no further acicion on the proposed rezoning was <br />possible at this timea Mro Musial made a motion, seconclecl <br />by Mro LaPonza to keep this item in comniitee for two more <br />weeks based on 'che request of the developer s3nce he is <br />out of town, and that a 30mday extension be requested f°rom <br />City Councilm Ayes, Ford, Esgar9 Musial9 LaPonza and <br />Prokasy m <br />Residents from Michael Drive present at the meeting <br />stated that they were opposed to rezoning the subject <br />area for garden type apartmentsm A Petition in opposition <br />to the rezoning was presented by one of these residents <br />with signatures of residents f°rom 19 of° the 23 houses <br />abutting the property being,proposed f°or rezoninge <br />(c) Great Northe.rn Boulevard <br />In the absence of any f°urther.communicatinns between <br />the develper and the Law Di,rector9 this matter will be <br />held in comrnittee pending a report fr°om the Law Directorm <br />(d) Brookhatxser Development, <br />A l.etter was received f°ram the North Olmsted Mayor° <br />requesting that before making any recomrnendations re- <br />garding the Br°ookhauser° Developmen`c a very care#°ul study <br />be made on the effect of this proposed developmi?nt on the <br />already eongested traffic conditions in this general areao <br />At the presnt time, this proposal also is being studied <br />by the Regional Planning Commissiono A motion vaas made <br />by NIr. LaPonza., seconded by Mro Ford to keep thp Brookm <br />hauser Development in comynittee fox° further studyo Ayes9 <br />Ford9 Esgar, Musial LaPonza and Prokasy.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.