Laserfiche WebLink
?. <br />r <br />(?(? a <br />.? <br /> <br />October 11, 1966 ..., pap;e Ll <br />and Lamont Str°eets have requested Council to deadmerid <br />these stx°eets so "Ghat they wi1l not havP access tp Great <br />Northern Boulevar°d, Resiclents x"rom Mitchell Dx°ive present <br />at the mee'G1.Y1€; stritecl argu.ments both for an.d against thp <br />dead-ending of Mitchell Drive, Motion laas made b? Mre <br />LaPonza9 seconded b,y, Mrm I-!ord to refer the problgrii of <br />dead-enda.ng of these streets to comm'i-tteee Ayes, Ford, <br />Esgar, Musjal LaPonGa ano Prokasym The Commfttep dv?ll bQ <br />Mr?. Esgar ar?d Mr. Fa?be6eo <br />Mro Spalding is now presen't at the meetingm <br />V Communications <br />(a) City Cta4ppi? rqturned Ordinance 66-247 to the <br />Plarinalng Commissian 41ong with a letter asking if the <br />Co?Mission woLald li?p i,o f urther r°eview the prdinance v <br />The P?anning Con1rr}iss3on w?11 take no f'i.trther action until <br />the T?4'w Department gives the ordinance f'L}rther study a <br />(b) Ale??er fwa5 ?'e'eeived f'rom the State of Ohio <br />pevp?qPmpnt Depaftmep? da?ed September. 30, 1966, st4ting that <br />UrbaTi Planra,Jng Aq§Ista.nce Grant for North Olmsted has <br />tY}e <br />been FL?parovedm ' <br />VI NO CQ?1PI1?•P ??4' Rep{JrtS <br />, <br />VTTT No ?ew Fus, <br />VTITA44ournnen` <br />Motion ?{q? mP.av kay Mx° o Fprd., seconded by NIr a LaPonza <br />t° 0040,qrn ??? rt.'_=.s??q AY?PSr, F'or°dq Esgar9 Musia]., LaPonza <br />Ao4asya Nlepting was adjourned at 1006 <br />aqd 5paTd?-pg, 1?P <br />oacpqMo . <br />Tack B. Esgar°, Aoting 5eq. <br />Jam?? ? ?ro?a??? Ch4:rman