Laserfiche WebLink
.. y <br />? ? <br />PI,t?TC'i COWISSION - JUl.v 23, 1q68 - i i^'e 2 <br />that ac, -^.s,:s be provided to aparfment Fite - one fx°om W?stviea and <br />r,ne fro:n Grt at Nmrthern Boulevard and f.hhat the axcsa ea.st of L3nda I?rive <br />be cled3eated for street purposes taa the depth of tYae acijacent lotsg <br />seconded by Mr.. Hyers. Ages: Lemnare,, Byers., Esga.r9 Richardeg R4usia1.o <br />The developers will bring in a plan showing the recommended clangeso <br />Since Mr. Niusita.l ar7°ived late and af'ter the ve-to on f;he I{lei?-ae - <br />DiBeneclett,e (Brookpark Ectonsl.on), Mr. Leonard moved for s°oconsideration <br />of the proposal; seconded b3? Mr. Byersm Ayesa Leona.ad9 Byera9 Esgar9 <br />Musiala lVas Richn..rds. 'iro Fsgax brduglat Mro Mu$ial up ta d.ait? on the <br />proposa l ii: r.uestion and Mr. Richards rraffirmed 12is posa.tibna Mro <br />Leona.rC reved tm reject the Froposaly seconded ly Mxo Masia1.. Ayes. <br />Leon,-,rd9 Byers, Esgzr, M1151a1. Nos Ftiehardso The proposal eaas offic3a.Yly <br />rejected. <br />IV'o New Developments and Stiabdivisions <br />(a) Blossem F,and CompF.nY - San<<y Rii&,e S?-ivisiora -?ap?d 6 m Approval <br />was given at the July 99 1968 meeting f0r Sandy Ridge Subdiv3.aion #495., <br />6and 7with the ps°svisien that a letter be ssnt sta.f.ing that this was <br />a unified -croposal. Mr. DiBenec?ette explained tha.t NPx°o NlcCr¢one Yaati <br />refused t€a sign the agreement and that the plane he iras preeenting <br />now Were id.entical t,o thmse approved previoualy minus th.e poxtien owraed <br />by Pdra McCrone. Mrs Esgar pointed out that the plans would still Yeave <br />f,o be checked by the Engineering Department and that approval cottld not <br />be given at this rneeting. Mr. Leonarcl meved to put the propmsal into <br />committee; seconded by Mr. Byers. A.Tes: L?onard, Byer€s, Esgar9 Musia.l9 <br />Richards. It wa.s decided that since there -rrill not bp anoth,es° regulai° <br />meeting of the Planning Commission until Septembers a special ffiee°t3,xig <br />will be held at 8:00 P.M. on Thursclay July 25; 1968 in the Engineex'3.ng <br />Depa.rfment for the purpose of voting on the praposalo <br />V. Corrniunicatiens <br />None <br />via ?omaittea Fteports <br />(a) Zoning Changes <br />(1) %ggestions fx°om Desian and platting Committme ?? ?Guneil = Ms°o <br />Byers stated that the stxggestion of sett?g a?? ???nta?? of <br />1001 eeemed reasonableo NIr. Baln stated that in many c&ses thia <br />v+enld force the acquisitien of additienal 1and in order t? comp1y <br />with the •rdinance. Airo Leenand suggested tlat perhm,ps tY?s would <br />be better considered aPter the cempletian of t1?e maBter plan and the <br />rezoning •f Lorain Road. The location of drivQways inU commercial <br />px°operties on cerner lots was dise;usseclv 14r. Eagar suggested t3mt <br />preseata.tion in vrritten foxm writh tlae suggested changes amd their <br />place iz the Ordisance poiated ovt wou5.d. 10e %set F??pful0 Mra <br />Maofal ouggested that Mro Prokasy ba request? ??la?or$•tfl i? writip-g <br />•n the suggestioaa submitted by Design and Plitting Cam1ttasa Hrm <br />Prokwey was csnsul.ted and agreed to d? thiae ?e will wrerk v3t1A Mro <br />Byers a.xd Mr. B.ba. <br />(2) faEki - Mr. Bagar pointed rra°t t1sat ????? ?eGmo to b@ am ???r-lap <br />and sraggested that tehis be kept ia com.itUe amd a?dled elmg wltii <br />the suggestioas f'aym Desigaa and F'lattin? ??tteQ of C(&%mWU.