Laserfiche WebLink
Bvard of Zoaing Appeals - May 6, 196$ - Page 2 --- <br />5. Appell.ant: Garlson's,. Inc., 27178 LQrain Rejaci. Reqixest to have a pairstea wall <br />sign on east wall of building gt x 20t wi.th panel lighting. <br />Recuest is in viole.tion of Ordi-n¢ince #-62-33, Section 1225.02. <br />Mr. Greene moued to continue case ta the next meeting pending the presence of the <br />apnellpmt•, secmnded by Mro Farcellini and passed. <br />6. Appellantz Living Homea, Inc. Request for a 5" frottt yard variance on S/L 74 <br />SheTTey Drivem <br />R.equest is in violation of Ordinance #62-33, Section 1159.01 which <br />req_uires a 501front gard. <br />Present: Mr. Lynch <br />It was explained the-t due to an erxor., the honue wra.s built 5" too cZose to the front <br />1ine. Mr. Greene moved to grant a variance of 5"; seconded by Mr. Roberts and passed. <br />7. Appellantm Nick Daelas. Reguest to erect a four stor,y inulti-family dwelling on, <br />Permanent"Parcel #231-:7-18 (Lerain and Columbia Roads behirxd the <br />bowling aIley). - <br />Request is 3.n via]:ation of Ordinance:-#62-33., Section 1155.01 (c) <br />which states thmt the raaximum height limitation sha11 be 35' above <br />grade level or 2? stories, whichever 3s the-.1esser. PrAsent; Mr. Dadas, a minimum of-3.5 persans from neighborhood <br />Mr. Dadas presented plans for the proposed multi-family dwelling containing 126 <br />apartments. Al1 of the neighbors in attendanee objected to the fmur story building. <br />Mr. Greene moved that the variance be denied; seconded by Mr• Roberts and passed. <br />8, Appellantt Topps Departrnent Stvre, Great Northern Baulevard. Request tc+ erect <br />a sign in excess of the permitted square footage. <br />Request is iri vi.olation of Ordinance #62-33, Section 1225.020 <br />Present: • Mr,-Wagner of Vagner Sign Co., Mre Yond.a, Mr. MeKay, Mrs. Sehermer. <br />Mr. Wagner presented sign -;plla_ns for the new Topps,Stesre. Mr. Yondo and Mr. McKay objected <br />to sign on back of Topps. Mrs. Sclzermer stated that so long as 3t was not a blinking sign, <br />it was a11 right with her. Mr. Idagner was advised that sign was nuch too large and that <br />such a large variance could not be grantedo -He will present regised p7.ans at the next <br />meeting. Mr. Roberts moved to cont3.nue the case until the June 59 1968 meeting; <br />sPCOnded by Mr. Greene and passed. . <br />9. Appellant: Enil R. Churchin, 2Lr097 LeBern Drive, Request to erect a.xi attached <br />garage on house. A 21 sideline varian.ce is requested. <br />Request is in violativn of Ortlinanee #62-33, Gection 1159.02 which <br />requires aminimuM of 201 setback irom the street upon which the side <br />of the house faces (eorner lot). <br />Presentc Mr. Churchin <br />It was brought up that a 71 variance was actually needed since the minimum setbaek <br />requirement is 251 and not 209. Mr.. Greene moved that the 7t variance be approved <br />provided a letter from the property vwners is presented which stated that they have