My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/20/1968 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1968
>
1968 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
06/20/1968 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:53 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 3:22:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1968
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
6/20/1968
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BOAFtD OF LOPIING APPFyALS - June 209 1968 - Page 2 -- - <br />- - <br />future. When asked if he would seTl even' a portion of this propcrty, he- r.efusede <br />The lot in questimn is short approximateZy 1800 squaxe feet. The_lot-next to.it which <br />is also affected by the property in rea.r is completely un usable.Mr. Biskino' sta.ted that <br />they would be -?,•i.lling to sell these Iots to the neighbors on a.djoining 1Qts if they so <br />desired. It was pointed out that a rear ,yarc3 variance woulc3 also be necessary for a <br />portion of the house. Mr. Greene moved to continue the case to the next meeting on <br />7/18/6$; seconded by Mr. FarceTlini and passed. <br />4. Appellantr Thomas P. Finnegan., 24830 Doe Drive. Request to erect a garage within <br />21 af the praperty sideTine. <br />Request is in violation of Ordinanco # 62-33, section 1151.04 whieh <br />requires that agarage shall be a. minimum of 51 from the Iot linee <br />Present: Mr.- Fi.nnegan, Mr. Yesberger., Mr. Tylke <br />Mr. Finnega.n eYplained that there is a swale a.t the rear of the Iot which would make <br />it necessary to build a completE retaining wall if a ga:ragc was to be pZaced in an east <br />and west direction. He requests to build so that thes right side of the garage is on a <br />straight line with the drivewa.y. If the garage were to be pIaced five feet from the <br />line, thPre would be very little manuevering room. The two neighbors present stated <br />that they had no objections. Mr. GreeMe rnoved to grant a variance of 31; seconded by <br />Mr. Forcellini a.nd passed. _ <br />5. Appellant: Ryan Homes. Request to erect a house at 26804 Chapel Hill Drive <br />with a. 451 rEar yaxd. <br />Reque.st'is in vio2atimn of Orclinance #62-331, Section 1163.0I which <br />requires a 501 rear yard. <br />Present: Mr. Greathouse anci Mr. Cassidg reprFSPnting Ryan Homes <br />Mr. Greathouse expIa,ined.that the house in auestion is a four bedroom split-IPVel house <br />valued at ftLa.,000. T-he lot is 70t X 1551 a-nd is as large as any left in the develop- <br />ment. The house will not fit onthis or any other lot without a variance. There is <br />a. wooded a.rea at the rear of the lot in question. Mr. Greene moved to gre.nt a 51 rear <br />yarc,i variance; seconded by tir. £oxcellini and pa.ssed. <br />Mrs. Parsnick appea.red again before the Board to questian why she could not install the <br />two sections of basketweave fence-as requested.' She was advised thzt the Boarcl could not <br />change their decition and that the ordinanee does not permit varianceN ehcept where a <br />haxdship ex-istsa She expIained that one sectiesn of fence would not help her problem, <br />that other fences of 61 or higher Frere instzlZed in'other pZa.ces and that furthurtaore <br />her neighUor 11as a 6' hedge that shouldnTt be pPrmittedo ShP ?Ms tolc7. that her only <br />course of action *?*ould be to file for a second appeal. <br />The meeting vas ::djourned at '9:30 P.M. <br />Fich4rd Nelson, Chaii-na.n <br />SaIly Henkle, SPCretary
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.