Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING CONIlMISSYOTT -(2f 25%69 ) PPage 2 <br />plano Mr, Richards stdied ithat he teYt that this pYan would be <br />deteriorating rather than impToving the at°ea, Mr. 1Esgar asked Nlro <br />ICarhan to ?tudy any new proposaY befare it comes before the Planning <br />Commissiona Mr. Byers moved to reject the Olms'ted Woods Re-5ubdivision <br />#]l due to non,confornance with the zonYng c:ode., NYr. Richards seconded <br />the mo°cYO?, Undnimously passed. <br />Tv? Nera DeveYopments and Subdivrsions <br />(a) Vacation of Margo - A pt°oposa11 to va:,a'te Ma-fgo which is a street <br />approaeimately 13S' long running oft Mgchdei Avenue, Mr, Karhan explained <br />that it was rela?ively close ico 1-80 and that the sireec would be useless. <br />It is a pawed road with no houses on 2t and people use it to dump trash, <br />'The deveYoper feels that th?s u?eless piece of road would be an eyesore to <br />the neighborhooda M-ro Leonard suggested haldYng bac7c on the vacation so <br />that the c1eveYoper couYd not deveYop ic ancY thereby costi the state more <br />money if they need to purchase it for zhe road, N1r. Esgar sieated that he <br />felt that the develope? ?ould °uacate the streec wichout Planning <br />CommYSSion dpproval if they so desire a.nd feTt that the Law Director <br />should be a.sked far his opinion, He fe]lt the developer was trying to <br />co=opex°ate witfi the City in ??bringing the proposal before the Commissiono <br />Mr. iFabek moved to put the proposal into committee, seconded by Mro Byers <br />and unanimously passedo Mro Y,eonard and Mr. NeYson wii1T serve on the <br />committeeo <br />(b) Clingman Subd3visson - Nlro Clingman presented pTans for subdividing lots <br />on JenkYns Ftoada This is an unimproved street. The sanitary sewer line <br />is being instaYled there riowo Mro Richarcls moved to put the pToposal into <br />committee; seconded by NIr. Leonard and unanimatxsYy passed. Mro Fabek and <br />Mre RYChards wriYY serve on the comm?ttee, <br />V. Communications <br />(a) Notices of CommerciaT PYans <br />Yn, NW corner of Lorain and <br />(b) BuiYding Department Repori <br />(c) Land i7se Survey <br />(d) Pamphlet entitYed "Nation's <br />filed with Building Department - Fotomat Drive <br />Walter Roado <br />Cities" <br />\1I . Committee Repor'ts - None <br />VII. New Business <br />Mr, Leonard brought ixp the subject of the new scihooY site west of Berkshire <br />Drive and stated that the plan shown in the newspaper showed no access from <br />Lorain Road. He feels that the PYanning CommYssion slhould recommend to the <br />Board of Education that they consider an additionaY access from Lorain in order <br />to relieve the burden of traffic on three resideniial thoroughfareso Mro Nelson <br />stiated that there Ys no problem at Spruce 5choo1 where the s3tuation is similar, <br />Mr o Richards stated that he feY c the second acce?s would be good planning e Mr e <br />Leonard stated that he wished io go on record as obyecting to this and moved that <br />we sent a letter ta the Board of Education asYc3ng `ehacthey consider an access <br />onto Lorain Roado Mro Richards seconded the motion, Ayes: Richards9 Leonardo <br />Noes: NeYson, Fabek, Byers, Esgaro The motion was defeatedo <br />i/IIIe Adjournment - Mro Byers moved to adjourn the meeting; seconded by Mre Nelson <br />and unanimorxsYy passed o The meeting was ad j ourned ai 9: 00 P oM e