Laserfiche WebLink
. , '. _ , . <br />f PLANIVING COMAfISSION - 3I25I69 - Page 2 ??.. ' . . . ' Bert Plain' 2$900 Loraim Road, citeci recommenaea standards f or retai2 <br />businesses Such as mini.mum fY'OIIl't8.gC9 minimum lot size' etz. He asked <br />kow fax° on the north side of Lorain east of Steartas Foad was to ba <br />zoned retail. It wa.s explained that from Steex°tis to Berkslsire 500' <br />back was so zoned. He fttrthttr -stated tkat he did net believe tha.t <br />,. so mucZi land Would ever be utilized far apartmenta and that much of <br />tlae lasad would be dormant. • <br />'. Walter AlIen9 30338 Lorain Road., obj ected ta the extension of Brookpark <br />Road a.nd the proposed rezamimg ix tYais area.. He stated that he felt <br />the developer was ttakixig advante.ge.of the City and that it wo1xld be <br />political suic3de 'if the City goes. through vith the prop6sed rezoning <br />Of LmT'a.1I1 R08.d, , <br />. Mr. Kaseman, 23900 Loraim. Roade statod that he has been in businesa <br />far 22 years at this loce.tion and tkat. kis la.nd wou1d be zoifted for <br />apart,mexits if the px°oposed rezoning is enacted. This would make his <br />busixess nen-conf'oraing arid if a matural.catastrophe should ks.t, he <br />would be unab].e to rebtzild., He feels the plans are discr5minatordr, <br />, Mr, Fmests. 30106 Lorain Road, asked tkat Plax3niaag Cmmmission and <br />Gouncil cmn8ider tlae legal aspects aaad the attitude of the courts <br />regardiag the proposed rezoning. He cited a].ettex that he sent to <br />City officiaZrr and was toId that the T,aw Director had receisred a copy <br />for his consic'eration. <br />Mre gelsik, 29510 Lopain Raad,'stated that kis land wtould be zomed for <br />,gaxdeR-t3roe apartnents and that -?&h retail business oR opposite corner, <br />he would be "sitting on an island°T. He opposes.such rezoning. <br />Mrs. Zipp, 29658 Lorain Rmad., asked wrhat use vrotrld be made of the back <br />pmrtian of prapes°ty d.ue east of kaer pxorerty. She wra.s advised that <br />it was felt that there wa.s room tv pttt a street in there wltta houses <br />on each side. She disagreed with this and -objected to any rezomixigo <br />Mra. Nestaf'f, a Pesident of Bradl.eg Road., asked how far t12e industrial <br />zoning extended. She asked that botln sides of° Bradley be includ.ed in <br />tke ixidustrial c].assificaticna since otherwise;--..it. wauld leave one side <br />of the street with homes backing up° te park land -facing an industrial <br />area axid. generaIly useless. MrQ Cas°ter9 anothes BTti,d.ley Road resident' <br />asked consideration on this matter a.,].so. - He Peela both sid.es of the <br />street should be zomed fox° light industrg. <br />, r2r. Anthony9 23205 Lmrain Road' sta.ted tha.t he purcliased th33.s property <br />20 yeaTS a.go because it was zoned comnercial. - Tha new pI€a.r3 woulcl be, <br />`for gardets type apartanents in tYsis area. He feels that garden-tvpe <br />. apartaaents would be tane.ppropr3.ate in this area beca,tse the rear yarcls <br />of homes on ITest 232 Street back up to th.is property. He obj ects to <br />any rezoning. Pla.nning Commission menbers pointed ent that his land <br />is adja.ceBt to existimg gardem type apartnentso <br />Mrso Schabel, 29341 Lorain. Rcaad, asked how many'feet west of Stearns <br />. Roa.d the retail zomirg would extemd. Mr. Esgaa' stated that the zoning <br />extended through t?1e veterinaxy hospital. : Mrse Schabel? st?.tec7 that <br />: thea.r property is imned.iately west of tlae anima.l hospit?.l.l axad asked <br />who `,rould want. to buiTd an apartment next to an animal hospitaI. She <br />obj ?cts to the rezonimg. <br />, T . <br />?" - . , : - ". ,, • , , , ,