10/28/1969 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' PLANNING COPHISSION Nove;nber 25, 1969 I, fsoll Ca.I1 . The meeting wn.s ce.].Ied to order at 8:00 P.M. by Chairman Jack rsgar. Those 'present i,ere ??'[ssrs. Jack Fs?;a.r., Fc?ward F?;,rers, Richar?). Nelson, Don^1d Ledvima, . Kurt Richar•d.s, Thonqas Fabek. Also present: J. Bruce Kitcl-ien, Law Director; Mr. Fiansberry, Engineering De-partment; ;?ally Henkl e, Secretar-y, II. Feading and Corr.ecting of A'Iinutes Mre NeZson moved to c3isnense with the reading of the ;ninutes of the 10/28/69 meeting and to a.-pprove as written9 Neeon.c3er) by Mr. B,yers and u??animousl_y passed. III. OId B,isiness - I1one . . IV. New Developments and Guhcivisions _ (a) AI.I,y Subd.ivision -L!2 = Mr.. Fsgar st^.ted that tlv.s pro-pos-0. had been sub- , mitted to lziTn Previouslv by ?4r. Ka.rh^.n a.nd that he had studied it because , no meeting s-ras helci ttiro weeks a.go. The proposal ca.ll.s for uubd.ividing o-ne Iot -with a 2041 fr.ontage on Mn.stick Road into two 1ot^. Ti3e plan ' :neets a1_1 of the ordinance reru?r.einents. mr. Fabek :noved to a.ppr.ove the Art?-iur 111Iy Sbhc'.ivision as r.reGer_ted; seeonded by Mr. Leonard and ' unanimously pa.ssed. . (b) SiZk Subd.ivi_ion - Pla.ns were nr. esentec f.or tlze subdivic7ing of three lots on Butternut Riclge Poad into thro Iots th?t would have 83.861 and ? 112.$41 front,age, Tilere is a dwelliizg on tne westerly lot (13) but Mr. Fansberry stated thPre would be 7io pro'olem on sideline rec?uirementse Mr. Leor.ard moved to a.pprove the Fa.rl and Pearl Silk Subdivision as presented I0/25/69; seeonded by yYr. rabelc and unanimously passedo V. CO'_ILn'!U?31Caf.10115 (a,) Build.ing Department Eeport (b) Notices oL' Comercial Plans filed z-rith the Builc?ing Department VI. COm.,ni't,tP.P Feports - T1ore VII. . New Rusiness ? " (a) North Park I)rive Fid.ening = Mr.-fiansberry e%mlained tha.t a.t the present ti,r,te North Park Drive has a 1001 right-of-i-ra.y coming off West Park I?rivP. However, other portions of the street nave only a 501 right-of-way. The City. iiaw has the op_,ortunity to pick up an a.dc?itionaI 50' onta one lot , ir the area where the street needs widening ?nd irisnes to have approval for the new Doxtion of street. !'[r. Leonard asked wllay the C1ty doesnt t • ', apnronriate 1.?nd t'ne entire I.ength of the cirea instead of piece-meaI one Iot at Z. tir:ze., He stated thFLt i.f the City ?,Tants 100t right-of-way, ., he iP.P1S a.ll the land should be piclced up now - not ir the future after