Laserfiche WebLink
" BOA:FtD OF ZONING A-PPEALS - 4/2/69 - Page 2. <br />that he does Mot fQresee any proble,-sa with the driveways situated the way they are. <br />It ,ras decided that there was a definite hardship involved. in so far as having anyone <br />see the trailers on dispTay witla the property blocked in the wa.y it is. Mr. Greene <br />moved to brant a 25' variance .for display of two trailers immediately behind the 25f <br />se-tback with the request that the Bzilding Departnent take immediate action to have <br />the Bretton Fidge sign removed a.nd with measures being taken to determine if the bus <br />shelter could be moved to another location where it zaon't block Mr. Simanonsl merchandise <br />and wone t b7.ock I,orain Road. Mr. Forcellini seconcled the motion. UnaniTaously passed. <br />4. & 5.) Appellants Hennie Homes. Request to erect a dwelling at 4021 Winton Park <br />Drive 201 from the side line <br />ax3d. <br />Hennie Aomes. Request tv erect a dwellinb at l4.056 Winton Park <br />Drive 17' from the sicle line. <br />Both request is violation o£ Ordinance #62-33, Section 1159.02 <br />vThich requires a minimuui setback on a corner Iot of 251. <br />Present: Dick Puzzitello, Roceo Puzzi'telle <br />Mr. Dick Puzzitello explained that these are the last two lots in the subdivision and <br />that in order to build aua.Iity homes comvarable to the other homes in the a.rea and of <br />adequate aize, side line variances would be Mecessary. It wrzs deaided that it was to <br />the best interests of the area to build homes that would conform with the neighborhood. <br />Mre Greene moveci to grant a 5' variance on SA 129 (402I Tr7inton Park); seconded by Mrs. <br />Eian and una.nim.ausly passed. Mre Forcellini moved to grant a 8t, variance on S/L 25g <br />(4056 Wintan Park) ; seconded by Mr. Lancashire and una.nimousZy passedo <br />b. Appe]:Iant: Brooks Electric Sign Co. Request to install a eo--op pole sign to serve <br />Cleveland Paint and Color Co., Sun Loa.ns and Todd9s Cleaners (all tenants <br />of the same building located a.t 26630 Lorain Road), Tot,al sign area. would <br />be in exce;ss of square footage permittedo Violation Ordinance #62-33, <br />Section 1225.02. <br />Present: Rsprerentatives of Cleveland Paint & Color, Sun Loans & Tadd's Cleaners, <br />A2rs. Gaul <br />PIans Were presented f or a co-op simn 48 square feet in size. tgr. Gundy pQinted ou't <br />that the sign would be within the ordina.nce except tha.t the tmtal sign area had been <br />a11 used..up._in facia signs and that the th.ird tc:nant of the building 'nad had to get a <br />variance of..$9 sauare feet.in order to hatre any sign at a11. Poor planning was cited <br />as the baSe....Q.f .theproblem. Owners of the businesses in question cited the hazard of <br />fast moving traffic and stated that they felt e. pole sign which would identify their <br />businesses before people taere on top of th?a might aid the safety problem. Discussion <br />was held in this regard. Mr. Forcellini moved to continue the case so tha.t the Safety <br />Director_ cosald be consulted a.nd the location exazninede Mr. Greene seconded the motion. <br />Unanimously Aassed. <br />7. Appellan.t: David Walker, 24159 Woodmere Drit*e. Request to construct an addition <br />301 f'ron rear lot line at closest point. ReGU°st is in Violation of <br />Ordinanee #62-33, Section 1163,01 which requires a 50, rear yard. <br />Present: Mr. and Mrs. ?Talker _ <br />It was pointed out that the house is on a eul-de-sne anc3 that although the Iot is. large, <br />due to its irregutar shane, a variance would be necessary. The houses to the rear are <br />approxinately 2501 baek. It was expliined that,since they have four children, they ar.e <br />in need of additional space. Mr. Lancashire moved tA grant a 209 vari2s!cee; at; close.st,;J-;