03/20/1969 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? Ix CITY OF R10RTFi OLMSTED - BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Specia,I Meeting hPld at Cit,p HaZl ------- Ma.rch 20, 1969 The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.ti'I. by Chair-nan John Roberts. Present: Nlrs. Eian, Mssrs. Roberts, Greene, Forcellir3i Also present: Mr. LeDtic, Puilcling Depart,ment ].. Appella.nt: Kroger Co., SF, corner of Lorain and Stearns Toad. Requesic for variance on building presently under comstruction. It was Mistakenlx Iaic caut 22" into the 1,01 rear yard setback fvr -whieh_-a,.:10.' variam.ce was gra,nted on 6/5/68; This leaves a rear yard setback ef 38r204-.. VioZat3on Ordinance rr62-33, Seetion 1174.06 which requires a 501 rear ya.rd setback if any part of the rear line is aajaceizt to a resic?ential district, Fresent: Kenneth b?i1son representing Kx°oger's, Mr. Saylor, arehetect. Mr. Wilson outlined 'how ffiistPke had occurred arad stated that construction ha.s beera stopped pemCing the results of this :?eeting... The east wa1l is complete, the south vrall built up approx-imately 121., Colum footixgs are in, the truck doek is in' etc. Mr. LeDuc presented a letter from the City Engineer stFting that the building is mow oi3 a sanitary sewer easement. If tke building is to reraain in this location, they waxt two mew nax-hoZes i-nsta.lled to pesmit sewer cleaming amd an inspectio? made of tke sewers tc? ascertain whether or not there xas an.y elamage sufferec?. The buiZder stated that they would coriply with the request made by tke Fagineering renartment and would be responsible for aII costs i.nvolvee?. Mr. Greene maved to grant an additional 22" to the er3gisal variance for m totaZ vf 1111011 with the provision that the Fire Department QK clearance for fire Zane aad that two mankaoles be instal7.ed in place of one unaccessible ma.nhole with cost to be born by the builder as nrescribed by the Engineering Degartrnext and wrth no safety violations iizvolvec3. Mrs. Eian seconded the motion. tlnanimously passed. 2. Appellant: Herbert E?titeh3e. Continuatiom of request for variance to use a detacked garage located at 31453 Loraira FoAd for retai1 sales. Violatiox Ordimance #62-332 Sectioxi 1191.03, preposed retail sales im a Limitee? Iradustry Listriet. Present: M:r. and Mrso Ri.tekie, Mrs. Bowers, Mr. and Mrs. Lindhorst Pir. R.itclsie presented photographs and additional ix£ormatioY as reo,uested at the last meeting. He sta.ted that lae wishes to purchase tkttis propertg, live in the house and do fumiture reupholstery in the garage. It is brick and lte is willirg to bring tke garage up to eode reeruirements. Neighbmrs stp-ted that tkey clid nc+t w3sh the land to be reze?ned commercial. R2ro Greexie expla.ined that the la.nd wauld not be rezoned - tha.t Mr. Ritchie was merely askixg for a vari2.nce to do the upholstery work ix a limited industry distriet. It was pointed aut that since Mr. Ritehie daes rsot a.lready own the prnpertg, tkere is no renl hardsllip ixvolved and that variances are only graNted where hardship exists. Mr. ForceIZixi moved ta deny the renuest; seconded by.-Mrso Fian and umaniraousZy passed.. 3. Appellant: Joseph IAcFarland, 4628 Ca.nterbuxy F.oad. Comtixuatioxi of request for varia.nce to build an addition oato existirig laouseo AdditiCn would be 416" from detached garage 0 Violation Ordi-na.rice #62-33, Section 1151.04 wlaick requires aminir.ium distaxce caf 201 between dwelling and detacked garage a Present: Mr. MeFarZand., Mr. Hassenrueck Mr. McFarlaasd expIaineeZ tha,t he has seven childrer-_ and is bad1y iffi need of additioraa,l space. It was ascertained that the Iot was 165' x 501 'Wi.th a 501 setback and that witk the praposed acldition, therQ would still be a 69' rear ya.rd. Mr. Hassexrueck objectecl