03/05/1969 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• BOAPD 0?' Zo? ?IITG 1??'PEn.LS ,- 3/5/0/9 ge 3 j - p? ' 7. _?ippeIl,, te Good Yee-r Tire Co. ? 4799 Great Northere^a BollIEVa7'G. Reques-t to e.rect signs i-n excess of nernaitted square footage, over lieight a:QC zn acldition.a1 Dole sign. Violation. Ordinance ;"62-33, Section 1225.02. rro representative of Gooe?--YeaT or Bel?ows Sipn Co, wn.s uresent. -114r. Greene niaved_ to deny the r.eques•t, for• VariWace since vai•iance is too eycess?ve to be coin-sidered. He suggesterl. t1a<at a _raore accept<^ble plrii. be SUbI;?itl+G(:t. Mr. La;;cashire seconded the motion. ' U13-?n11?IOUSZV p%1SSP.d. 8. Appe17_amt: Robert Tul.chim, 6294 Briglato-a Dxive. Rea,uPst to erect a 61 felice around rear yare1. Viola.tion Orc1_inrt lice J162-33, Section 1151.04, :E'orce not to exr,eed 4' iza lieight. Present: Dr. Tulchin, Mr. CieG?.ewicz, nir. Kollcr, Mr. Zonarie Dr. Tu1c11in er-plainerl th-at they have a large Ger.ci^..? Shepherd dog mand that a 41 fe-z-ice would. not be ac'.equrvte to keen kii-P. in the yard.. He statecl tl2at he does not wa.nt the dog to be a -nuisance ta t1he neighbors and a1so citea the faet that his house is <ndjr-cent to Chestnut Elementa,ry School a.rcd, that c:alc3rem cut tbrc3ugh his yard ?nd t'_n?t a1tlioug11 t'ae dog is gently, 'ae feEls the fence woulcl serve ?s protection for the children. Mr. Cieslewicz stated that ?e fc:It t1he dog could be discinlined ^..nd that he obj ected to a 61 feACe. Pfr. KeTler felt that a. 61 fence would detract frora t?e meighborhood. Mr. Lenane st^.ted t?hat there is a ai-rference in Alevation of his lot -nd. Dr. TL?lchimt s lot next doox -,?d that a 6' .f.ence wcsuld appear to be even kzigher than t'na.t. Dr. 7'n1c'n-i-ri st<3.ted t'hat disciplining adag is fine but tha-t for p-eace of r-ind, a fex:ce was sti11 i-iper«tive for the protection of the neia-hbors, thc c-haldrea axid for the c1og itselz. Mrs. Eian. raoveel -to gratat a variance f'or ? 61 fence. Mr. Tanca,shire sta.tecl that 'qe felt a 4' fence i•ras sufficieiit. Si-,ace there was no secoad to the ?noti on, t4rs. Eian withclrew her motion. Mr. Lancashire 'taoved to de)?y the request for va.riance; scconded by t•4r. Greene. Thc motio:? pawsed with Mrs. Eian coting no. 9. !1.ppellant; Jasepli MeFar.I2nc'i, 462$ CanterburyRoad. Fequest to build aa adci.tion or,to exist.i.ng house. Ac±c3ition j•rould be 41 6" fron detached bara.ge. Violatio-ri Ord.inance ?'6z-339 SL'Ct,1Or 1151.04 which rcquirQs a rtlinimuin ciistarce of 20' beth*een dwellirig anc3 c7e'tac?ied garage. Present: Mr. Fiassenrlleck No on,e wa.s pxesent to -rET)resent 14r. I4IcFarland. Mr. ?3asse-rueck stated that l-ie tia.s opposed to +.,'ne rec?uest sii3ce it would block aut liis view entireTy. The i ot is small and t'iere ?+as F..lready bPe)D. one variance grantec: fCor a previous ac?.d.itioii. Since no Sc-le clrawi?.?gs Trere subriittEd, T'4r. Gree-qe uioved to continue tke case to the Fsext mEP't1!3gj Gecorded by Pdrs. Fian and_ passed. . Nir. Gundy brought up tt2e ruestion re;a-rc?ing Joseph LLramoxi'.a requPst to cispT,-3,y tr•a.iIers wdthin the setback rxea. Iie st?ted t'hat t1aere seems to be soyze ciuestiox o:F' c3efiLi.tion in this regazc3. ?nd that he STot?ld not ord_er the trailers moved baek becn.use he r.oesn't rraj3t, to 1.entre the City or himself open for a 1awsuit. TI-Lb setback 'aa.s a1ways beez;i ii1terpretecl to merk the building line the entire widtri of t11e lot. P4r. Roberts rer;ues-ted that t'ne -Secretary i-Fri-te a le-tter to the Law Director recsUesting an e.ncwer prior to i:?? ??est -mPeting. The meetinb was adjounied at 11:25 P.M. - John Poberts, ChE irman "a1Iy Hen-kZe, ceCre'tary ?? A&I