12/02/1970 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'CITY t7F IdORTH OL?'viSTED - BOARD OF 20NING ?±PPEALS R.egular ;•Seeting heJ.d at City Hall - December 2, 1970 The mee Uing was called to order a.t 7:35 P.M. by Ch=:.irman Villiam, Greene. Those Dresent: '•issrs. WiIliam Greene, John Roberts' Ernest Green, tiiilliam Tubbs, Mrs. Ei?n AIso nresent: Mr. Gundy9 Builcl.ing Gommissioner The ::iir_utes of the 11/?>/70 meeting were wnprotTed as written, 1. Ar,r.ellan+s Pratt & Lambert Pa.int Co., 26628 Larain Road - Gontinuatian oi request to erect 61 X L,.' rale sio . [Tiola.tion Orde _#62-33, Section 1225. Present: 1'1r, Teude? This case Fras continued sa that boa.rd members could oersonallv ins,r,ect the area in c,uestion. Mr. Teudel stated that the ov,*ner of the property tanere his store is locetited has a.greed to remove the ba.rriers in the narking Iot which wilI Eliminate same entranr,e and exit Nrob? ems. There ?s no aole sign ir_ this area at the present time. It w-s felt that due to tne loca.tion of the store, the sign request was re<,sonable. Mr. Tubbs moved to gra.nt a variance of 24 -sauare feet on conditian that the Iocation of sign be approveca b3* the Safety Birector and with the added condition that this noZe sign be utilized bt* other businesses in the building if -pexmiesion for sucn a sign should be granted. Mr, Ernest Green seconded the :!iotion. Unani.mausly passedm 2. ADpellant: Garriwge Carpet Co. - Reauest to erect store between 25143 ?nd 25195 Lorain Road with insufficient roarking C.nacese Violation Ord. hF62-?3, Section 1?12m02 which determines Mir_imur:i pa.rking reciuire:nents. T'resent: Mr. uov=:cic (owner), ?•7r. Pate (builder), Mr. Siel.atycki, tylro & Mrs. Bprtley It waG exDla.ir_ed that 34 ':,arking sraces wre renuired by the ordinance. Mr. Kovacic and f-Ir. Pe.te stated tha.t they v*ish to have 12 s-oaces in iront of the s-tore a.nd t?7-.t there would be sra,ce f_or 41 adc!itiona]: ^Daces at the rear i:,ut that this are? woulcin't'ue 7aved or finishecl a.s -rarking spaces. Y Thsy propose to use lime*tone in this rear area with a. concrete :I drive on each side of the bu-Zdinge They sta'Lled that -with ez business of the na.+ure of this one' tnere would never be n need for inore than I: spaces at one time. It was furthur exrlained th2t 3/?, ef the bua_7_ding area vould be utilized as storage but beca..use the 'cuildir_g is not divided , a11 of the total square footage mruGt be caunted ir_ figuring the parkina reruire*_ientso Discussion was held. Mr. Sielatycki ac'ced about rear parking and i? a fence wou?d. be e•rer.tec?. a.long rear 7_ot Iinem 14r. KoLta,cic ctated that txees would be along the rear line. It was sua?ested by the BaaTCI tha.t 12 a.dditional oarkin,; spaces be p?.ved at the rear with the rest of the a.rea covered by li-nentone. This seemed to be a reasonable coranromise consic?.exin; the use that wo??lc? be made of the building, i•Zr. E. Green moved to gra,nt? a. variar_e.e of IO par'1ing svaces sunject to the ur_clerstanding th?t pa.rt a_F the buildinR is 'oeing used L'or storage and subject to the building being used anZv, for retail car?et sales and wiih the s-tin-ulztion tha.t the twelve spaces in the rea.r h?ving a h-.rc?-stand turning radius oi' 35' from rear of bui? ding. '•Zr. Roberts seconded the motion. Unaniriou sly pas s ed v ?a A-,•ne11ant: Northwooc7s Apar.tmFr_tF,9 23831-85 Da.vici Drive - Reauest to opera.te a nursery school in ex_iGting party room and adjacent plwynround at rear oi propertyo Violation Ord. _--62-33, Section 1151.03 which states permittPd uees in a multi:ale residence district. Present: Mr. Gole of Perth Land Ca., Mr. Yuncnik' Mr. CarsonJ Py1rs. r,IcNeeley