12/02/1970 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOAFD 4F ZQNING APPr ALS -(I?_/2/70) - Pa.ge 3 I Presentt P4x. ancl Mrs. Da?'I°agh' Mr. a,;'zklinaki Mr. and Mrs. Darragh stated th^t they wish to erect a 61 basketwen.ve fence a?ong the re2r Lot line, Their Datia is just 381 from this line and tney have had auite a problern with a Iaro-e Gerzaan Shephard at ±he rear -an.d also witn bo?sterous neighbors who refuse to co- opera:te with them in anv was; . They £eeI that the fence would Iook nice a.nd. ;,rould he1p to curtai1 noise and would relieve the nrablem of the dog, Mr. ZaTiklinski, nei;hbor at the rear, st=.ted that ne rad no objection to the fence ?-?nc1 that his next door nei;hbor' Mr. Dobbins, ha.s. no obj ec'lion eithero Discussicn was ze? d. Mrs. Eian moved to Lrant a va.riar_ce fbr a 61 fcnce a.lon.a the 70' rear lot line; seconded. by Mrm Tubbs and unanir:iouely pwsspa. 8. ApDellt.,nt: Charlss Fsolognia - RecueGt to erect dS,Te?ling on Fexm ane:nt Parcel ,-',f235-14-91 Decker F.oad. ? 51 sideline ?t^.ri.a-nce, a 31 raQr yard va.riance a.nd a variance of. 13 squar.e L'ect in livir.g area, is re7ziested. Violation brdo ;`.`b2-33, uection I151.01 which requires that the yum af the two sidea be not less than 2015 Section 116-1.01 which re7uirzs a 501 rear yp-rd and Sectior. 1153.02 which deterniines minimu;a livo-ble floor wreao Present: ?Kro Eolognia., Councilman Eernare Speedling T1r. .t,ojognia exola.inec1. +h!.,,t +„he Zot is on?7 40' :{. 140' anc1 that the nouse Tr.Tould f.it into surrour.ding home sty-Ies and enhance the afie^. He hn-s enlarged the .nouse to 1075' first "loor ?ivinQ area but 281 wws substracted in figuring because the tub, etc, is not living area. In orc?er to ?neet the size renuirement, rear and sic?e line vari2nees are neeessary. Mr. Speeclinb s-tated that he knows the a-opelTanv is trying des,pere.tely to meet the ordin?.nce and that he feels this nla.n co.nes as close aG possible to meeting the require--aents. DiacuQsion z}rwG held. Mro F. Greer_ stated that he feels in the over-all interest of the city, a. varia.nce Ghould not he granted since he feel.s th.e ?rea will he too croh*d.ed. Mr. Roberts moved to grant a 51 sideline9 31 rear y?rd and 13 square feet of Iiving z.rea variance; seconded bzT Mrs. Eian ar_c? )asQed with rir. E. Green voting no. 9. Anrellant: John i-'feCrone - Reouest for variance on frontage renuiremen+ of 46 sublots with 701 frontage in a single residence "A" district. Violation Ord. 'i62-33, Sectzon 1157.01 which requirQs a miniznum of 801 front-.ge in an "A'I area. PreGent: t-4r, McCrone, Mr. Ka.nareff, Council President FrGncis OeNeil. Mro Kanareff sta.ted that r4x. McCrone has 46 lots in -the area and cp.n°t comply with the cluster ordinance as did the other develoners in the areao He feels that ii quality homes can be built all arouncl on 70t lots, the;r shoula be per,-nitted ta build on 70' Iots also. ?ie feels the ordinance discr.iminates a.gainst the amall d.evelo;ner. Mr, 0'?Teil stated that he c'.oesnot believe it is the intent o£ the cliaster ord3nance to discriminate a.;ainGt the snall deTreZoner and that he feels a. variance should be granteao It vas tiointed out that P.'Ir. McCronee s plan has been suhmitted to Planning Commission and to Cauncil and hQs been rejected by both. Discussion g•*as held. A Ie-lu-ter from La,h Director Bruce Kitchen was conside-red and r2embers of the Boarcl dic]n't`'eel the case feIl within their jurisdiction. Mr. Roberts -notred that based on the ac?vice of the Law Tsrector tne variance be denied; seconcled by Mr. E. Green and unanimously passed. 10, ApTwe112r1t: Hennie Homes - Request to erect ciwel] ing at 39Z-,3'?iood park Lame (corner of Sand.ers Lcq..ne) with a. 20" sic?e ?,ra.r.d on corner lot. Vialation Or?,. 7762-33, Section 1159.02 w'_nich reciuires am?nimum setback on a corner lot af 251. Presentt Ray ar_d P,ick Puziteilo -Phe r_?eve?opers st-,.ted that in order to have a double attwehecl garage on their standard 521 Presic.ent model9 a 5' S1deI1IlE variance would be necess?ry. . The lo-t iL 811 x 1551. None of their mor?e1 ho_;2es ti,,auld fi+ on this lot without a variance. It w-ps pointed out that this rroblem arises onl`r on corner lots because of the 25' sideline reauirement. Discussion was helc',. It was suggested +'_nat by tux'n-ing the hause in t'_ne other direction fa.cing uanders Lane,