10/07/1970 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BaArD or ZoNING A'P?.c:ALS - (10/7/70) - Page z. ? 4. Appellant: S'I,`PT_.`hen Clement6768 C?-,pru,- 'DY'ive - Request for special per?nit to erect tool shed in rear ya.rd. RecruPSt snade a.o per Oz°dina.nce ?62-33, Section 1I33.09, 1_'re5ents 1e1r. Clemen-t Mr, Clement explained that he wishes to erect an. 81 Y1?t gable-roo£ Gtorage building at tre r.e,---r of his lot. Distance to the house at xear would be 50 to 60 ya.rr7.s. The lot is hrooded an.d there is a 3' pr.iJe% hedge aZong the rear o.f •the Proyr>erty which waulu. obscure the sher1. i•?rs e Fian i??oved to grant a sDecial iaermit; seconciecl k;y P•ir. Rober°ts ancl una.nimou?ly passed. Appellant: Cedar Point Superette, 5600 Coluznbia Road - Reryuest for extenQion of non-conforming use and ua.riance for second nole sign. Fer.,ueut is in vlalation of Ordin.:..nce 116%-33, 5ection 1225m?2 and cection 1,231.03. PrF^ent: Mr. Macezko Mr. Macez'_.co e?.-p1ai.?ed tha.t there is no identifs,rsnU sign visiule h*hen a:rProaching fra:n the north and that this is a rea1 harctshin to his businesa. The store is non-can:Forming in a C?ass 1tA" Rasidential are?. The e<isting pale sign is for Fleetwing gasoline and is TI,, square feet in size, The -proposed sign is b" X 6t . The only sign which noi-7 r1.esignates the huQiness is on a fence on the south sic?e. Tt iras suggested that P•?ro Macezko talk to FIFPtwing about incorporating the "npes^ette sign :,dth theirs. Mr, Frnes.t Green maved to c;ontinue the case to the November meeting so that Mr. Macez?zo can COrifG3' with Fleet,,*ing ?n this regard; seconded by Mr. Roberts and un_animously passed.. 6. ADpellantz Chax1es Balognia. - RequEst to eree;t dwelling on Pern?.nent PP?rcel ,? 235-I1.v-91 Decker Road with iri5tly'i°iCierit si.cl.^line:. Request i:s in violation of Ordin:;.nce #62-33, Section I:161.0I requiring that the sum of the two sides bP not I.ece than 201. T-Iresen ta Mr. Bolo?;nia9 ?Ir4, G?,Ivin Mr. , Bologmia s-tated tha.t he hac1 decided not to build aS large a house as shozm on the apT?Iication ,a.nd that -this -would mean that he would also have to '_na.ve a variance on sc, U.are foot.ry;e of the house. It was explained that ne-ot noticc;s wauld hnve to be aen 'u olit [ince this rec?uest -was no'u included or_ the previoua no-tice. Tr1rs. GaZvin stated that she a1?j ecf,s to Mr. Bo1.agnia cuilding on the 40' lot in question and stated tha.t therz i5 a va.cant 1PO' Iot F,djacen-t to it on ons side and tha.t she has two 40, vacan'-. lo+.,s on t,na other sicle. Mr. RobeTte i:?oved to cont?irue the case to the i3ove-nber meeting so that neti* natices can be sent out; seconded by Mr. s.r'nest Green and unanimo3sly passed., 7. Appellan$t Bucke;re Hotase F:es,taurant, 23135 Lorain F..oad - Req-ae4t to alter and acld to exiQt,ing restaurant. Renuest is in vialation oi Ordinance ;??62-33, Secti.on 1174.08 periainiizg to mininiuii air rer;uirement' uection 12I2.02 pert,airiing to minimum parking -:,nd Section 1231002 pe?taining to permitted continued use. Presente Mr. Quirk ( x.ttorney) , Mr. Ba.rne tt (Lannings9 Incm ) It ,,*^.s e.9a1ained that Buckeye Hause is n.on-confor:;iing due to s.etbaek and th7.t air reQuiry-nent var, ia.nce was due to iwelling that exists on property. 1he parking inee•ts the reruiretnent on a per seat basis but nat on -the basig of square footage when new add.i-tion would be com-nle+ee Mr. Qui-rk explained tY:at Lannings, Inc. hope to tp-ke aver the Buckeye House, build_ an a.ddition and ex-tens;vely remodel the existin? builrling. It was pointed ou 'u that the existing nouse and garage an the pro,pertv coUld be torn *3r5?rkin ; z,Tould then be available and that the 2nir_imum air d.ovn ?nd tha 'u tacaditional