09/09/1970 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

iPOIRD OF ZURZNG A.'1'EALS - (9/9/70) - Page 2 - Mr, Grendell expla.ine6 tLat his home 3.s non-con?onuiizg in that thers iw not the required 151 total vide wia.th. I3e statec that hx.s famiZy needs moxe ?pace and the addition i5 the best means o:" obtaining it. ?'.is ne:ighbors' have na objectians. Mrm Raberts moved to gra.nt a.spPCial. permit for Wing to non-conforming bu? 7 ding a,.nd a 31 sideline variance; secondeci. k:y NIr. Ernest Green and unaniraousl? paused. 5. kppel1ante St. A.nclrew Lutheran Chureh, 30$5 CTague Roadb Reryuest for special perxnzt to buiZd pernanent buiZd3ng in residential dietrict. Permit recuested as per Ordinaace #62-33, Section 1151.01 ( E) m PresAntt Nir. Boadey (r. epresenting church and also a neighbor) , IVIrs. Henrich) Mr. Maruna, Mr. Scheel' Mr. Venes, Mr. Forch3.one, r,any- other residents of° area Plms -vrere prewented .for the proposed churcn. It wwas pointed out that the Io+ is hee.vily vrooded and that it i-rould be alea.ned aut and as :many trees a1? oved to remain as paseibTe. Mr. Gundy sta.tec3 that too d7°1V8WoyS 'hTEY'2 required by the C}rdinance a.nd that they were requestang perna3.ssion to have vnly oneo Mrs. Henrich, next daor neightaor9 Nta.ted that she nas no objections. Mr. Marune questioned the clrainage in the area and was told that this is wrox°lced out ]y the City Engineer, Mr. Sch2el questioned use of rear of vrapertlIr a,s pIayo ound. It wa.s sta.ted that the church did not plan t,a erec ti sw5.ngs or other eauipment and had made no reques-t pPrtainang to a playground. The area is used preuently by neighborhood ch.zldren in thss wayo IvFro Forchiane stated that he felt the church t,rauld imprave the situation and that there would be mur,h more contrvl than there is at uresent, Mr. Vennes awlted a.baut poasible lights in naxking area and also suggeeted blocking off the parking area at r_ighte Neiglzbors ?n attendance stated tha-t they had .no objections. Mr. Ernest Green maved to grant a special perssait for construct3on of Ste Andretas Chta;r. ch with the stipulatianS tha.t (I) 1?rainage be acceptabl.e to City Engineer and aTl adjacent property ovners, (2) Parking areas are to be shzelded by appropriate shrubbery to the satisfaction of the City Bu?lding Gommissioner, (3) Vasual- c?earance at drive nea,r CZague Road iN to Tneet the xeouirements of the Safety Director. It is ougge ytec? that nrovisions be mac'Re .for the securitv of the p?^operty.. He f'urthur moved to grant a vnriance for the use oi one drivewa? vith the suggestion that a f'uture entranee be sought at such timme as adj aeen t property might become available, Mr. Roberts seconded. the motions Unaniznou?ly passed, 6. Appel? ant: RicbaTd Uh1.9 23390 Stmnsybraak Dxive. Request ta add uti? ity room and parch to rear oF existing nause. A 2e rear yarcl variar_ce is requested. RequeQt is in ;ri.al?tion of Or.dinince #r662-33, Section 1163.01 vhich requires a 504 rear gard. Present: Mr. UhI ?.fx, UhI exrlained that he wishes to adc1 a-utility raam and a acreened parch to rear of hame. The house 3s a split-7°v?l of frame conGtrucvi_on. Ais neighbors have no objections. Mr. Hane'raer;, next door neighhmr, added a similar addition a. shoxt ti.me a.go. Mr. Ftobert8 moved to grant a 24 rewr yard vgriance; seconcied by Mr. Ernest Creen Ar_d uazanimQUSly passedm 7. Appe1.Iant: Ladd Gangidine, 25094 Fa.wn Drive. Request to erect on a.ttached ga.-rage on ex3sting dwel1_zng. Request is 3.n vio?n,tion of Ordinance #62-33, Sectian I161o01 whieh 8taten that the ; um of the twro sides sha.?l be not Iess than lso . A 51 vari?.n.nce is recuested. PreSent: Mro Gangidine Mro Gangic?ine e.ti-p?iinecl that they t•ish to add an attached gara,ge since ? det::ched garage vould take up too m»ch af thair rear yard and a]-so w4u? c1 crpate a d.rainage problema The hause is a ranch s+vle annd the neighbor most closely e"fected hac no obj ectians. He