08/05/1970 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ZONITTG PPPE.a.LS -(g/5/70) - Page 2 ?a Aa pellante Beverly Dier, 2748$ Butternut Fcidge Roauo Rncluest to rebui i-d deta.ched gaxage on existing r.oncrete slab 43" frori pronerty I.ine and 56" from adjacent detached garagee Violaticsn drr3. #62-33, Section 1151.01? requiring a ms.nimum ;• of 5e between garage and any property Zine. Presenicz Mrs. Disr Mrs. Dier explained that their oTd garage was torn down in June and tnat they wish a 17". variance in order to rebuild on the existing slabe The garage next door is non-conforrning and 5011 fro.?i her proDosed garage. Mx°. Heiser (nex.t door neighbor) has no objections. Mr. Raberts -moved to grant a 17" varian.ce to repIace the garage; seconded by Mrs. Eizn and unanimously passeda 3. A-npellant; James Shi.ban, 3971 T-ennyson Lane. R.ecuest to erAct a. 61 fence arouncl rear yard. Violation Ord. #62-33, Section I151o04 irhich states that a fence may not exceed 41 in height. Present: Mr. Shiban Mr. Shiban ex?DIained tha.t the? have 8 chi? dren and 2 la,,,rge Siberian husi?r dogs wh3. ca.n jum? a.t Ie?.st 51 . He iurthur sta-Lued tha.t there is an oven area in the rear that is all weeds, rubbish, etc. He tirants t,o ersct a white hasketweave :£ence and fsels tha.t it w:i.ll enh?nce the 'Oroperty. He presented letterS from Johrz Orear cmd EdiTard Kreismer stating their approvaI of the proposal. It was fl,irthur Dointed out that both the 13vingroom and Datio area are Iocated at the rear of i•Tr. Shibants house making an attxactive view even more imnortante Mr. Lancashire moved to gra.nt a 2' variance for fence as shown in pZane; seconded by Mro &rnest Green and unani,-nously passedo 4e A-ppeT.lant: ZeTitliam Corcoran, 1994 WaItex Road. Recuest to install 61 .ba.^ketweave .f.ence ? 11 ofi ground ( tot,a.I height 71). around rear gard. . ViolatYOn. Ord. 1?62-33, Section 1151.04, fenae not to exceed 41 in height. Pre9ent: Mr. Corcoran Mr, GY°eene- r.ead letters from-Mrs. Marsh, Mr. anc? Mrs. Mersing and Mr. and Mrs. Rsiger, 245$4 F'].aren.ce all objecting to a 71 fence. Mt. Coroora.n sxp Zained that he wzshes to encZose a-4-1: abovc gx^ound pool with a 61 fence 11 off tne ground to facil3.-tate easy mowing, raking9 leaf removal,. etc. He stated that thers is no privacy wrhatsoever and that the poal ladder ia higher .tha.n 41 so that a 41 fence woulci not serve the nurpose.o The pool is situated 81 from the side Zot line. It wa.s suogested tha.t a px°ivacy fenes 61 high could be erected if the pool could be moved in and the fence 15e off the lot linee Mr. Carcoran stated thc-tt tnis wrould he a nrob?em because of electrica.l connection for puwp, etc. It was decided that a stagp-ered fence along the Qne side ?night a11P--7iate the problem: t,o ?some degree. Mr. Ernest Green niaved to g1rant variance £or 241 Qf 61 (total hezght) #'ence along west fence Li.ne from 11 s°ear of house Iine towards rear of loto Mr. Lancashire secondecl the motion and the motion passed with Mr. Roberts abstaining f'ram vating. 5. Appellanta Bauer Development, Inc. Request to erect d-wexl3.ng with attached garage at 27260 Nantucket Drive taith side yards tota].ing 131. R.equest is in vio2a.tion Ord. #62 33, Section 1161.01 which states that the aam o.f the tao sides shall not be-less than 151. Presents Mro Bauer, Mrm Oring (representing OImsted Ziooas Haineokners Assn.), Mr. Qppenlander, Mr. Swa.etyniowski, Mr. Mahoney • Mre Bauer explwined that there is an existing foundation started by KimborTy Development Co. but nev'er completed due to financial diffa.eulty, Mr. Gundy atatad that an error wa.s apparently ma.de when ?'ne original permit wwas is5uecl. Mrm Oppenl.ander statPd that he obj ects to any variance. Mr. Mahoney stG.tec1. that he seeS no reason for deviation L'rom the code. hlro Oring cited the vast number of va.rie.nces that have been gran-ted and asked about future building