Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />r POAFD OF ZONING APPEALu -(6/3J70) - Page 2 <br />moved +o grant a varia.nce fox a 61 fence as showa,i on sketch for reasorsa of safety; <br />seeonded by Mrs. 'Eia.n and u7ia:nim-ousIy passed. <br />4. Appellant: ?rving Vlaterbury, 4571 Carsten Lane. RPquest to cover patio at rear <br />of dwP1ling. R.equest is in vivlmtior: of Ore?inance #62-13, Section <br />1163.01 w-hich requires a 501 rear yard. <br />Present: Mr. ZwTaterbury <br />Mr. Vla.te.rbury statee1 that the patie is sunken and that in i.ts present uncover-ed state, <br />it is a catck-all for leaves and other- debriso He wriuhes tvi cesver the patia with a <br />rmof anc?, construction tha.t w3:1:l rnatch the -house.It -u-iI.T eventually be screened in. <br />There iE an open leat to the rear. 11e. pointed out that the area is reaZly completely <br />Useless a5 it ma-w stands. - On the basis, tkat -withcut a variance, the area cottlftl t be <br />used. for 13vi.ng, area, 14ro Lancashire moved to ?rant a 12' rear yarcl vari.ance; secoindecl <br />by Mr. F.oberts anu passeC with T4r, Vho Greene voti.ng. no. <br />5. AppeIlant: laTil.liam Ralls9 ?39 SheTley Drive, Re€tuest to erect 61 basketweave <br />fence 11 frori sz,TaIe iMSide rear property line. fiea,uest is in violation <br />of f?rdixiance #62-33, Section I15I.04 vk.ick states tlaa.t a fence may iaot <br />exceed 41 in height. . , <br />Present: Mr, and Mrs. Ra12s <br />Mr. FaIIs ex?ila,ined tha-Iii the fence ?,rould be decorative and would serve as a backdrop <br />for an Oriental garden. A 41fence would not create the clPsired effect. The en-tire <br />yard is :an Oxienta:I gare3en. Twenty $onw caf stone ha.ve been hauled in. Board mienber5 <br />asked if a 51 fence woul:d give the same ef'`f'ect and Mr. Palls statea that a 51 fence <br />would be satis£actorye Mr. Foberts,?qovea.:.to grant a var.iance of 11 in height far <br />the installation of a 51 fence .720 across-uthe back of the property, Mrs. Eian seconaed <br />the motion. The motion fa.iZed w3.th Mr. E. Green, Mr. L.ancash3.re and Mr. W. Greene a.1.I <br />voting no. <br />6. AiPellant: HerUErt Albers, 24594 Gessraer Road. Request to add an open sun porch to <br />rea.r of dwelIing 12" from existing. detached garage. Reruest is in <br />violat3on of Ortlinance #b2-33' Section.. ].15I.04 whick reczuireN a m3.nimum <br />af 20e between detac'hed gar=:?,e and diaelling. . <br />Presents Mr. and Mrs. ATbers <br />In examining the p1an5, it was d3.scovered tkat since Mr. and Mrs. :Albers have rso pIans <br />to cover the porck, no variance would be necesss.ry. They eppeared as a result af a <br />misunclerstanding wi-th the tyu3ldirag aepartnettt. <br />It was decided that a sl3ecial meeting wouTd be held on Tueselay 6/9I70 for the ?urrose <br />vf a public hearing requested by Ga.briel Zs? go. <br />The meeting was a.djourned at 9:15 P.M. <br />?Vi11.isaa Grec;ne, Chairrr?e-n <br />Sa.7.ly Henkle, Secretary