05/06/1970 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.' , ?.. BOAFD OF ZONING APPEpLS ,( 5/6/70) - I'age 2 •?°` Mr. Greene stated that due to the fact that certaiii persons to the rear of the property, did not receive prorer notification, the case would Ue continued t,o the next meeting. 5. ppr±ellant: Donald Durbin, ?1y930 Mitclzell Drive. R.ecuest to erect a 51 fence on a coxzier lot. R.equest is in violation of Ordizzance #62-33, Section 1151.04 wh3.ch states that a rence niay not exceed L,.,' in lieight al.ong smde or rear rxoperty line wnich does not extend nearer the street line than the building line a.nd. may i7ot exceed 30" in height from the building line to the street Iine and on the street line. Presen.t: -Mr. Durbin Mr.. Durbiiz sta.ted that ae has.a backyarc7 -p001_ and that he -wi.shes to install the fence to n,rotect children from the pool, to protect his own children from the street and for sotne measure of privacy on his corner lot. The pool is an above ground. type and is 41 so tha-t a 51 fence is neeaed for any real benefit. His neig!zbors are in agreement t-rith the request. It was pointed out by menbers of the Boa.rd that this iS in effect the ma.n's rear yard a.nd that the corner lot was creating the problem insofar as the 30" height termitted for certain portioas of the.fence. T12e rest of the fence could Iegally be 41 wit??out any variance. Discussion was held and Mr. Lancashire moved on the basis of increased sa.fety -to grant a 30" variance and a I.t variance as required. Mrs. Eian seconded the :motion. Ur_anir,lously passed. 6. Appellant: Art!aur F3unce, _3185 Olmsted Drive. Request to erect an addition to existing dwe2?ing Iocated on corner 1ot. A 121 setback varia.nce is recauested. RequeNt is in ;riola.tion of Ordinance 71,62-33, Section 1159.02. present: Mr. Bunce Mr. Buizce explained that he needs space to accomodate increased fan3ily demands. The lot is irregular in shape and is on a cul-de-sac. He granted a.n easement so that side- walk cauld be installed and now he must have a veriance in order ta build the desired addition. He -p)resented 1.etters from-Mr. q.nd Nirs. Medaglia and Mr. Young statiizg that thev have no objections. Mr. Roberts pointed out that he gave the ease?n.ent in the best interests of the City and moved to gratlt a 121 setback variance; Seconded by Mrs. Fian and unaninously pa.ssed. 7. A?apellan-t: Linda Walker, 2481I Doe Drive. Request to erect detached ga.rage 31 fTom _side Iine, Reaues-t is in vioJ_ation of Ord'iziance #62-332 Section I151.04 which requires a minimum of 5' betti,een garage and anJ property line. Present: Mr. Alex Tuma (f<^;.tlier oi the appellant) Mr. 2`u7na en.plained t13at lzis daughter wants to build tlae garage straight ba.ck a.nd 3' fror,i the side line due to the fac'Ll that if it is moved over, it wQUId be.too difFicult to get in and out of. There is a st-*ale in the rear of the prop erty and garage can not be rnoved furtlaur ba.ck. A letter from. Mr. SIioi1sell_er (r.ext door neighbor) -mas presented stating that he was in agreemezat wit1h the rec7uest. M r. Ernest Green moved to grant a 21 variance, seceinded by Mr. Lancashire and unaxiiiri.ously pasaed. , $, t1P'Pellantt Ro1.and Sc?iurdell, 6574 McKenzie Road. Request -to erect 5' Teclwood fence along rea.r proppx•ty line. Rea,uest is in viola.tion of Ordinance #62-33, Section I151.04 which states tnat a fence may not exceed 4! in heiglzt. ?'resent: Mrse Schurdell A'irs. Schurc?elI exinIained that their. neighbor to the rea.r has 24 ca-ts and tliat they wish to install the £ence in an effort to keep the cats out of t'tieir yard. She stated that the neigllbor is in agreement with the rf-auest. Mrs. Eiaiz moved to gra.nt a 11 va:--.riance