08/23/1971 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 POARD QF ZO341IAIG APPFP.L5 -(8/23I7I) - Page 2 .!,. Appellant; First Universalist Church, 5050 Porter Road - Reniuest ta erect 64r of 61 fence from end of stone wa1l to oroperty line and then west along portion of property line. Viola-tion Crcl,inan.ce 4,1'622-33., .uection I151.04, fenee no t to exceed. 41 in height. Present: Jaa.n ti;7arren, Mr. and Mrs. Rush., Ivlrs. Higgins, Mrs. Hawk, Mr. Valtz, Ivir. OZson, 14r. Devesca, Mrs. Devesco, Mr. :Arm,steat, Dr. Fa.uline Cl-ance A11 witnesses were sworn in. Mrs, S,iarren explaineci that t;he church -wishes to erect the fence in question in an effort to ease tensions wzth the neighbors. The .fence would be redwood and w-ould be -?, thin If of the property line. It would serve as a sc-reen and would help to prevent Dersons from cuttsng thraugh the neighbors" property. Mr. and Mrs. Rush sta.ted that they donet fesl a fence h-ould servE any puroose other than to aggravate them. Mru. Higains, Mrs, Hawk and Mr. Olson aII stwted- that they dian° t ieel a:fence would deter neople co:ning through others property. Mr. and Mrs. Deveseo, members of the cYiurch9 felt that the fence vrould be benef:icial. Mr. Armsteat statett-that the purpose of the fence would be to ezse the tension. Mr. Ya1tz statedinthat the chuxch 3.s 3oing its best to come up ti-ith asalution and.that the,y feel a 6' #'ence would be more effec-tive than t'2e 41 height permit-ted. Dr. CI?nce stated -that negatiations have gotten them nawhere and that the church has reaZly tried to satisf'y the neighboru. She added tha'ti Mrs Rush wants no young people around and tha.t the church fei t that perhabs the fence would help. PTrs. Rush denied that this wa.s true. Discussi-on va.s held Gnc it •k.=as felt thC t both church and. neighbvrs shatxld. attempt to talk out the Drobi.em. Mr. Berg?und rnovecl to continue the case; seconded by Mr. Scheef and unanimously passed. 5. Appallant: Charles Gunr_, 24759 Deerfie?d Drive - Reeuest to erec-t 51 fence dround nartion of rear ya.rcz. Violation Ordinance 71w62-33, Section I151.04, fence not to exbeed 49 in height. Fresent: Mrs. Gunn had caIZed to say she was iII and could not attend the meeting. D18Cll5'°l0?1 was held. Mro Scheef moved to c3.eny the recuest; seconded by Mr. BergTuna a.nd un,rtnin?ously passed. b. ApraEllant: N. 0. Boaxd of Educatior_ - Request to erect 51 fence fron the MidvaIe entrance to N. a. High 'Sj'chool -to the southern point oi Pdorthern and fro-m +he northern paint of'Northern rvenue to a. point oDposi-te the southern end of the Service Center of the west property line o#' the Secondary 61chovl site. tTiol.ation Ord.i.nance #02-33, Sectio,n 115I.04, fence nat to exceed 4' in height. Present: Mro Storch, 1 4r. Berda.ch, Mr. Schurde'!l? MrM. Woods9 Mr. Caster9 Mr. Molnar, Mrs. Humble All witnesses were swarn in. It w?as poir_ted ou-t tlzat a var•iance -wa.s granted for a continuous 61 fence at the 6/2/711 meeting. Mr. Storch stated that they fto*w?;wiEh to. have an opening at Northern. pll af the neighbors in attendance stated that they wanted a continuous 61 fence wzth no entries and situated as shawn an pIan approved at 6/2/71 rneeting. Mr. SchEef maved to deny the request; second.ed by Mr. Berg? und and urranimously passed. 7. Appellant; H& R.Realty - Request to erect office.building at corner of Lorain Road and CoUntry C1ub Boulevard in excess of._.!ieight Timitati:ans. Viola.tion Oxc?inance ;=?b2-33, Sectior. 1174.0I which stipulates amaximum hei:ght of 501 or five stories, whichever is Isss. Present: Mr. Shur, Mr. Herschm.an, Mr. F.osenthal