My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/28/1971 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1971
>
1971 Planning Commission
>
09/28/1971 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:37:08 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 6:36:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1971
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
9/28/1971
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P1anning Cotmnission - 9/28/71 - Page 2 <br />Mr, Adams would 1'ike to combine one and two xnto one 1ot' as he tiaants <br />to build alarge house and needs a double lota Mro Brewer made a motion <br />to approve the subdiv3.siona It was seconded by Mr. Leonax°d and unanimously <br />passedo <br />(b) Sandy Ridge #9, 10, llg 12 - Mra Sparky DiBenedetto presented his plans <br />for a cluster developmente The plans showed an alJ.owance of 1,74 acres <br />for recreat3.on or school purposes. Mro I,edvina checked the zoning <br />ordinance and it states that there must be an a17.owance of 506 acres <br />for school or recreational purposes. Mro Brewer made a motion that <br />the appl.3.cation be denied on the basis that it does not provide a <br />stafficient recreational area. It was seconded by Mr. Ledvina. <br />Mr, Leonard stated that the Planning Commission cannot consider <br />something that does not meet the requi.rements of the 1,awo The motion <br />was withdrawno The P1anning Commissa.on cannot accept the applicat3.on <br />for Sandy Ridge 9, 10, ll, and 12 and 3.t wi11 not consider the proposal <br />because it is not in conformity with statutes. <br />(c) Devries Subdivision tl Plans were presented for a subdiva.s3.on off of <br />lexander and Westpark Drive, The proposal was to take a long 1ot <br />and subtraet 70 feet of it and then in turn divide that 70 feet into <br />parcels 2 and 3 and se11 the parcels to adjacent properties so<1-that <br />they become a perfect rectangle. Mro Richards made a motion to <br />approve the subdyvision; seconded by Mr. Leonard and unanimously passeda <br />VI. Communications <br />Ord.inance #71-116 - There was no acta.on taken on Ordo #71-116 at the last <br />meeting as no one from the administrat3.on was presenta PfLra Leonard made a <br />motion to infornn council that the landfil,l area is adequa.te for the service <br />department and there should be no delay in us'ing what they already haveo <br />Mr. Richards seconded the motion. Mota.on failed to pass. Mxa Leonard, <br />withdrew the mota.onm Mr. Isonard moved to approve the intent of Orda <br />#71-116. Nlr. Ra.chards seconded the motion. Motion failed to pass0 <br />The Planning Commise3.on turned down the intent of Ord. #71-116 as there <br />is not enough s,nformationa <br />VII. Committee Reports - Me°i*-;:?Ledvina rece3.ved a breakdown of the Planning Comm3.ssion <br />budget from the finance directoro <br />VIIT. New Business - none <br />IX. Adjournment <br />Mr. Ledvina moved to adjourn the meeting; secorided by Mra Brewer and unanimously <br />passed, 3'he meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.Mm
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.