Laserfiche WebLink
? Board of Zoning Appeals d August 2, 1972 Page 2. <br />Garage must have front door. (Continuation) <br />Present: Richard Margolius. <br />Tr.'itness was administered the oath. Mr. Scheef reviewed presentation made at <br />last meeting by Mr. Dave Margolius (Richard's father) and his architect. Mr. <br />Scheef had visited the site and iound unoccupied garages and some being used <br />for storzge. He had also visited another apartment complex in another suburb <br />taith open shEd type garages and found them unattractive. Mr. Scheef suggests <br />this case be taken b ack to Planning Commission. Perhaps the ordinance should <br />be reviewed. Jamestown presently is attractive. 14r. Scheef wonders if gar- <br />ages could be elimin2ted instead of going to the shed type garages. He does <br />not want them left open in North Olmsted. $10.00 per month per car port goes <br />along with the rent. Mr. Gundy said permitting garages to be used for storage <br />is violation of fix e ordinance as well as zoning ordinance. Mr. Scheef said <br />rubbish is being stored in at least two garages. Mr. Scheef made a motion <br />tha.t request be denied Vaith the sugge5tion the owner reappear before Planning <br />Commission. Mr. Roberts seconded and the motion passed. <br />5. Glenn M. Limpert, L282 Clague Rd. Continuance of request for <br />variance 1133013) Request to inake alteration of garage of- <br />fice building detached from existing residential home on his <br />lot to include A apartment'type living quarters. Violation <br />of OZ'Ue 62-33 5cction 1151-01• <br />Present: tvlr°a and Mrs. Limpert, R.obert Kall and Jack Farmer <br />Witnesses were administered the oath. Nir. Scheef stated the case is continued <br />because of divergence of opinion and board members warited to do on site inspec- <br />tion. Mr. Krowiak's house is for sale. Mr; Roberts had visited the site. Neigh- <br />bor does not object to Mr. Limpert's son living there, but what happens if new <br />owners come? N1r. Scheef said old buildings are being improved and that Mr.Limp- <br />ert is doing business on the site. There are two houses, tile pipes end of <br />trencher are in alcove with bus; outside of that there is good land.scaping in <br />front and back. There are living quarters in second building. Building per- <br />mits shoul:d be secured. Second building has been used for apartment for a <br />long time. It must be used by direct member of family. Stipulation musi; be <br />made that property must be used as one piece. 14r. Scheef said on thai: basis <br />that the owner secure approval from Building nepartment and have inspection <br />and that it be used with u nderstanding it is in no way a second residence; <br />it cannot be soYd as income property - only one family he would move to grant <br />the variance. Mrm Roberts seconded the motion adding adequate shielding of <br />tile and business equipment, 4 ft. basket weave fence running west,should be <br />installed. Motion passed unanimously. <br />6. Appellant: Nlr. and 14rs. J. Gerstel, 23181 Marion RcI. Request <br />for variance 1133.13 for addition to non-conforming dw.elling <br />in violation of Ord. 62-33 Section 1231.02. <br />1 resent s 12r. inTF.isbarth, builder9 represen-ting the otaners. <br />tvitness was administered the oath. Set back for dwelling is 39 ft. Owners <br />wish to add family room and bed room. There is enough room all the way around. <br />Mr. Roberts moved to grant special permit for addition to non-conforming build- <br />ing. Mre Scheef seconded and -the motion passed unanimously.