Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS - February 2, 1972 - Page 4 <br />All witnesses were sworn in. Mr. Baker stated he wanted to build a family <br />room at the rear of his house. Mr:' O'Brien, the next door neightbor, <br />stated the house is 4 ft. 'from the side line and 40!sl" to the property line. <br />The building overhang is 1'6" so this neighbor is 38-1 /2" from the wall to <br />the property line. Mrs . O'Brien objected that i.f this were built, her view <br />from the back of her house would be nothing. She added that there was a <br />drainage problem in the back also. Mrs. Lunt and Mr o Blain gtated they, <br />too, objected to the addition because it wouldn't add to the neig:'li:borhood. <br />Mr. Scheef stated that homes of this type in a group do not lend themselves <br />to a change in archite'cture. Motion was made by Mr. Scheef that the <br />request be denied; seconded by Mr. Berglund and unanimously denied. <br />10. Appellant: Manor Care, Inc ., 23233, 23235 Lorain Road - <br />Request for yariance (1133.13) for 6' fence. Request is in <br />violation of Ord. #62-33, Section 1151.04, fence not to exceed <br />4' in height. <br />Pr es ent : IVIr. . Donald L,edvina, Mr a Joe Ros e, Mr. Fohlman <br />All witnesses were sworn in. Mr. Ledvina from the Planning Commission <br />stated that the "fence would be the entire length of the property 6' high. and that a variance was not required to the whole length. Mr. Rose said <br />that the problem is that ?headlights would shine into the property of certain <br />residents and that Planning Comnnission suggested a 4 ft. fence would not <br />be adequate. Mr. Pohlman stated that about 5-1 /2 ft. of his property would <br />not be fenced in, and he would like Manor Care to provide tliis so he was <br />completely enclosed. Mr o Rose agreed that this 5 ft. would be added if the <br />board granted the variance for a 6 ft. fence. The motion was made by <br />Mr. Scheef granting a 2 ft. variance; seconded by Mrs. Eian and unanimously <br />approved. <br />It was decided that meetings would be held on the first and second Wednesday <br />in March due to the nuxnber of cases pending. A letter from Par.ker Reynolds <br />Chevrolet was read to the Board. It was decided that Mr. Reynolds would <br />be re-heard on his parking variance. <br />Mr. Waldermyer who was given a variance for a tool shed couldn`t buy the <br />size the board approved. This case will be re-heard. <br />Meeting was adjourned at 11 P.M. i - <br />?, . <br />? ,