Laserfiche WebLink
\ <br />.l <br />Planning Comtrissiqn - L/11/T2 F'age 2 ,?. <br />? . ..(b) ?auer :iezoning <br />r. Sa.yler ci-rculatec a letter amon-• members of the ?lanninq Com- <br />mission. Tt -rfas an unsatisfactory letter; -we need something more <br />binding. Ua;;; ler needs mvre tim?e ior _-ormi,thxnlq shotaing more <br />-legal intent, agreer+ierit o.n access, -and a, legal aescription show-- <br />ing roaa•aay into Clubside - arqxr_'T?Jay large enouqh to accommodate <br />emergency vehicles. 1`here -viere about 20 a..djoinin^; proper-t,y own- <br />ers present vith objec tions to the proposal, is. ?`,ansbury read <br />a letter dated A*u::•. 1970 to ;.-s. nauer asl;in; him to drain the <br />svamp area ar:d stating ordinances violate?d. Also, on i:arch 2, <br />1972 :2r, harhan requested a committee of City Council to look into <br />the problem. ?:r. Ledvina rrade a motion that the proposal be xe- <br />jected s,n the basis of poar planninry. 's. Srewer seconded the mc- <br />tion. iiessrs. -Brewer, Ledvina, ?.:1liott, :3yers and Uavis vated in <br />favar of the motion wi th j':essrs. .?_teonard and Aichards castint- dis- <br />sentin;; votes. The motion passed. <br />(c ) Clarkins _:ezoning <br />?-_'r. 1'aul eimer renorted on meetin?; -oith area residents at 10:00 <br />a.rn. last Saturda,y, Clark2ns is villinn to move store plans a-- <br />T,aa,y from ` est i_ianchviev Avin?- laroFr ;.uffer strip znd is ??,illinc, <br />to deed the 11 ac.res 7,ahich the,y ot;?n but do not need Gt rear of <br />the nro;Derty to the cit.y for recreational purnoses. ` r. ":eonard <br />moved ;'or a-provel of thE proposal. r. 3re7i7e-r seconded the <br />motion. Du.rin-: ciscussion t'.:ere Uaere voluble objections fz°om <br />?,. residents of `= est 'Aanchview kve. incl.udin- > rs. Haller, : ebe, <br />`s. 'i'rossen and i•:r. Sexton. Gene ":.'1ot, 2598h T,orain :=,?d. spoke <br />i.n favor oi thE developrnent. - r. ??ichards stated tnat he is not <br />in favor oz ke:;rhole developments such as this and that it sr.ould <br />have frontag~e on ;.orGin AC. : r. ?,aonard and Hr. L'rever voted <br />in favor of ti:e Y:otion Trith essrs. 3yErs, ??ichards, . 1liott, <br />uedvina, and llavis votitza a-ainst t:e iiiotion. The motion vas ce-- <br />feated. ',,, ° ? -? <br />?? <br />! -.?. <br />!.:eonard referred to Februar;T 22, 1°72 minutes of .'lanning- <br />Conu;aission in T,7hicn motion Llas made sor ("ouncil to consider im-- <br />proving the incustrial area on ti-jE south sic.e of Lorain <<oad 1?:ith <br />streets and severs and revertin?; the cost of the same to the l.and <br />owners. Leonard asks i= there has been any response. <br />Plannin;_; Conimission U?as informed tha t°andy ?Lid,_-;e Subciivision ::9 <br />is ?,aing vith olan for open ditch and fence. <br />1,1r. Davis re-oorted on ??ieeting he had attenc?ed in re,,-?-ard to changes <br />in zonin7 ordinances. _Ae said tAiere are sorye minor anu some ma jor <br />proposals for change now in the hands of the Lat•3 Director. <br />?7. New Develonments and Subdivisions <br />(a ) Olmsted firms :;:ezonina <br />??ansbur;l?stated. th.at there Ti:;ilJ_ ne a tvo vee?, continuance <br />on this proposal.