11/13/1974 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of Zoning Appeals 11-13074 - 2- Chairman Hamill read as follows: "The Board aFter a review of all of the evidence finds that 1. There is an unnecessary hardship inherent in the premises which would be caused by strict applica- tion of the code; 2o Refusal to grant a variance would deprive the owner of substantial property rights; 3. The granting of a variance would not be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Codea "Therefore the Board grants the following variance: l. The 50 fto buffer requirement shall be reduced to 20 ft. as relates to contigtzous residential prvper- ty 2. The requirement of 16 units per acre is variad and the Board will permit 19.7 units per acre or a maximum of 248 suites of garden type plus 70 suites in the six story building.°P l. Carl Hunter, 5883 rZevere Dr. Request for variance (1133a13). Request for special permission for tool shed. Violation of Ord. 62-33 Section 11510 04, Present: Mr. and Mrs. Hunter and others. Case and appeal taere read. Witnesses were administered the oath. Appellants are rid of chickens, they had citation. Shed is not stabilized. Mrs. tiiarner has no objection to tool shed, but did object to the chickens. A'Irs. Aidonis has no objections. NTrs. ir?aaftngton questions moving of tool shed on state property and asked if it will house animals. Drawing shows nothing. Mr. Lec3vina moved to continue until more informatian is submitted, Mr. Duskey seconded the motion. Motion passede Ntro Gundy said he will notify State of Ohio to remove the tool shed. Mr. Isdvina moved to rescind firs't motion and maved to reject re- quest. Mr. Duskey seconded and motion passed. 2. H. G. M. Realty Go., 28364 I,orain Rd. Request for variance (1133.13). Not built according to plan a.s approved by Council and Flanning Commis- siono Violation of Ord. 62-33 Section 1213.0h (improvements in parking area) and violation of Ord. 62-33 Section 1215.01 (approval of plan). Presenta Mrv Gundy, Mr. Goggin, Ray Gawthrop, Terry Burkee Law Director Gareau said he taill review this case. Witnesses were administer- ed the oath. Letter of September 20, 1974 was distributed to mem- bers of Zoning Board, Tetter revieTaed Planning Commission con- cerns and stipulations of conditional occupancy. There is no uniqueness nor hardship in this case. Mr. Gundy showed the ap- proved plansa grassedareas, plan for bank, ingress, landscap- ing (7 ft. strip) grade and seed area; also pictures taken at time of citation, blacktop, slope and rear parking area. Recyeled Bond - One etep to eave our envixonment