My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/11/2013 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2013
>
2013 Landmarks Commission
>
03/11/2013 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:45:17 PM
Creation date
1/24/2019 6:17:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2013
Board Name
Landmarks Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/11/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Schumann was unable to attend the meeting; however he submitted written comments <br />stating he believed the annex building had little historical value as any architectural detail which <br />had significance had been removed. The poor condition and instability of the building makes it <br />not worth saving. Mr. Neville said that the school has agreed to remove the arch over the <br />entrance to the annex and incorporate it into a new ground sign. The plans submitted are site <br />plans not architectural plans and inquired if detailed plans would be submitted. Ms. Wenger said <br />that the plans submitted were conceptual plans. If the commission agrees that demolishing the <br />annex would not adversely impact the historical district it would be appropriate to rule on the <br />COA to demolish the annex. The Planning and Design would review the detailed development <br />plans. Commissioners agreed the demolition of the annex is appropriate due to the dilapidated <br />state of the building. Ms. Wenger said if significant changes are made to the conceptual plan it <br />would be referred back to Landmarks for further review. Mr. Neville asked what the schools' <br />plans were if funds were not allocated to develop the site once the annex is removed. Mr. <br />McDade said it is the schools' intent to work with the city to develop the site in accordance to <br />the conceptual plans. Mr. Morse suggested incorporating butternut trees into their plans. Ms. <br />Walker suggested the new sign be placed in the same fashion the library sign is and noted the <br />landscaping shown was consistent with the neighboring site. <br />Mr. Rerko moved, seconded by Ms. Walker, to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness to <br />North Olmsted City Schools for the demolition of the structure at 27253 Butternut Ridge <br />Road, PPN 235-16-008; subject to Planning & Design Commission and City Council's <br />approval of a detailed development plan prior to demolition peranit being issued; motion <br />passed 7-0. <br />North Olmsted Citv Schools; 27501 Butternut Ridge Road, PPN 235-16-021: <br />A request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the existirig house. <br />Mr. Schumann's written comments indicated that the home does have history and historical <br />significance. The home is a vernacular style and one of the oldest in the Landmarks District. He <br />believes the original home should be saved whether at its current location or perhaps moved to <br />Frostville Museum were it can be preserved. <br />Mr. McDade made a brief presentation on the North Olmsted City School's interest in <br />demolishing the building at 27501 Butternut Ridge Road. Mr. Morse asked why the house <br />would be taken down. Mr. McDade said that in its current condition, the building represented a <br />nuisance and a liability to the school. Mr. Rerko asked if an alternative use could be proposed <br />for the building; he would rather see the structure reused than demolished. He said historic tax <br />credits could be pursued for building improvements. Mr. Neville said the house was built around <br />1830 and belongs on Butternut Ridge Road; it could provide a unique opportunity to promote <br />local history. Mr. Richner also wanted to pursue the discussion of alternate uses. He toured the <br />house and took many photos. The basement is cut stone probably from the local quarry. The <br />inside isn't in good condition yet saving the structure would be ideal. Perhaps the additions and <br />garages/sheds could be removed. Mr. Thomas said the two-story portion of the building is the <br />oldest; they could look at the condition of the wood under the siding. Commissioners felt the <br />house contributed to the local historical district. Mr. Morse said it would be optimal to leave the <br />building where it is; demolishing it for greenspace is not valid due to the historical value it brings <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.