Laserfiche WebLink
In regards to policy, Ms. Lieber said that the Administrative Code should be updated to eliminate <br />conflicts in the Landmarks Commission chapter as well as to make the processes for COAs more <br />understandable to the general public. The ordinance should enable the Commission to carry out <br />all of the objectives of the Historic Preservation Plan. <br />Ms. Lieber asked the Commission for input on the action item on historic tree preservation. She <br />said permits were not currently required for residential tree removal, so the process would have <br />to change. Also, the Commission would need to inventory what trees were targeted for <br />preservation. This might not be as high of a priority as other plan objectives. <br />In regards to specific properties that may qualify for landmark status, the group discussed <br />Springvale Ballroom and the water tower. Springvale's 100th anniversary will be in 2023. In <br />advance of that anniversary, the Commission can complete the landmark process and organize <br />recognition events in cooperation with the Springvale staf£ Commission members also thought <br />the water tower could qualify as a North Olmsted landmark. The water tower is a popular and <br />iconic landmark in the city already, and research could be done about the era it was constructed. <br />Ms. Lieber said that a campaign could be built around both Springvale and the water tower, with <br />events and multiple avenues of communication and public information. The water tower also <br />lends itself to inerchandise and eye catching graphics. <br />Mr. Schumann said that the Butternut and Coe cemeteries should be included in the preservation <br />plan. He said that the Commission should be a partner in their stewardship, to help identify <br />needed maintenance and improvements. He also suggested that the Butternut Ridge district <br />signage and wayfinding should be included in the plan. Ms. Lieber suggested expanding the <br />banner program language to more broadly address recognition and wayfinding. <br />Mr. Morse said that neighborhood identity could also be addressed in the plan, both for <br />established subdivisions and also areas of the city that developed around the same tiine and share <br />history and architecture. Mr. Schumann said that the first step for recognizing a new district with <br />signage would be to legislatively create the district. The group discussed what entity should be <br />responsible for subdivision signs and agreed that Landmarks Commission could play some role. <br />Ms. Lieber said that this ties into a Master Plan goal, as well. <br />Mr. Neville and Mr. Dubowski noted changes in two captions needed on the timeline page. Mr. <br />Neville said the Commission will review the document at the December meeting with the goal of <br />adopting the plan in January. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:13 p.m. <br />? <br />David Neville, Chair mberly Lieber, lanning and <br />Development Director <br />Date: /??..? ?.E 2 a/e