My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/04/2017 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2017
>
2017 Building and Zoning Board of Appeals
>
12/04/2017 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:45:54 PM
Creation date
1/24/2019 9:16:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2017
Board Name
Building & Zoning Board of Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
12/4/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. A variance for the location of an animal shelter, code prohibits shelters to be located within <br />200 ft. of a dwelling on any adjacent lot, applicant shows the location is less than 200 ft.- <br />from dwellings, Section 1135.02(e)(1). <br />Mr. Aspery stated that the applicant is requesting to construct an 8 foot by 8 foot chicken coop <br />on their property located at 4480 Martin Drive. He clarified that while Section 505.19 of the <br />General Offenses Code regulates the keeping of domestic farm animals on private property, the <br />scope of the Board's review falls entirely within the zoning regulations found in Chapter <br />1135.02(e)(1). He added that the proposed coop falls short of the required 200 foot minimum <br />distance for 2 nearby homes on adjacent lots: 4456 Martin Drive, at 180.61 feet, and 28786 <br />Oring Road, at 177.98 feet. The required 10 foot rear and side lot line setbacks have been met <br />based on the submitted drawings. <br />Mr. Babjak described their rationale for locating the coop as shown and clarified that the coop <br />will be 8 feet by 12 feet. He added that it will be regularly cleaned, well-maintained and <br />surrounded by landscaping to make it more aesthetically-appealing. Mr. Aspery asked the Board <br />to consider not only the zoning regulations but also the quality of life impact that these structures <br />may present to neighbors if not sited properly. He noted that the applicant proposes to construct <br />their coop to be as equidistant as possible from all nearby home and, given that there are no <br />nearby water sources or other unusual siting issues that would create a burden for neighbors, this <br />appears to be an ideal location for the applicant to construct their coop. Mr. Papotto asked Mr. <br />Aspery to explain the certificate of zoning compliance, with Mr. Aspery clarifying that it is an <br />additional administrative step to ensure that the coop will be in compliance with what is <br />permitted either by code or a result of the Board's decision. Mr. Allain and Mr. Raig expressed <br />their agreement with Mr. Aspery's assessment of the proposal, noting no objection from <br />neighbors. <br />Mr. Allain moved, seconded by Mr. Papotto, to grant the following variance for 17-10307; <br />Ray & Karen Babjak; 4480 Martin Drive: <br />1. A variance for the location of an animal shelter, code prohibits shelters to be located <br />within 200 ft. of a dwelling on any adjacent lot, applicant shows the location is less than <br />200 ft. from dwellings, Section 1135.02(e)(1). <br />Motion passed 4-0. <br />17-10317; Heidi Birch: 6258 Somerset Drive <br />Representatives: Heidi Birch and Mark Stash, 6258 Somerset Drive <br />Proposal consists of widening the driveway. The property is zoned One Family Residence B. The <br />following variance is requested: <br />1. A 5 ft. wide variance for the expanded width of a driveway; code permits a driveway to be <br />the width of the attached garage, applicant shows 5 ft. wider than garage, Section <br />1135.02(2)(c). <br />Mr. Aspery stated that the applicant is requesting a variance for driveway width at their home at <br />6258 Somerset Drive. Code requires a driveway providing access to an attached garage be no <br />wider than the width of the garage whereas the applicant shows their proposed driveway
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.