Laserfiche WebLink
? <br />Mr. Papotto clarified that since the proposal does not have driveway access, it is classified as an <br />accessory structure. Mr. Allain was concerned that if this variance is granted, it would allow <br />three large structures on one parcel - a house, detached garaged and the barn. The applicant <br />wants to install a driveway since the ground is usually wet. Mr. Smik was interested in revoking <br />the 2012 variance if this one was granted. Mr. Gareau would need to look into an applicant <br />trying to abandon a previously granted variance. Discussion regarding the applicant being able to <br />expand the 2012 variance to avoid being given permission to build multiple large structures. Mr. <br />Gareau believed the applicant can try to enlarge the initial granted variance through another <br />application, as if the garage was built initially and they would want to enlarge the structure. Mr. <br />Gareau reviewed the options of the applicant: request a vote or revert back to the 2012 variance. <br />Mr. Smik wanted the board to go forward with the vote on the current proposal. <br />Mr. Allain was concerned that the building would be larger than a house. Mr. Mackey believed <br />the variance would allow a third large structure on the property. He believed the applicant did <br />not want to build two structures due to financial reasons. Mr. Papotto thought that there are quite <br />a few homes in the area that have structures of similar size, so it is not unusual. He pointed out <br />that the applicant was aware of the size concern when he built the home and requested the 2012 <br />variance. He was not in favor of this proposal because of the possibility of being allowed a third <br />structure. <br />Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Mr. Allain, to approve the following variances for 18- <br />10583; Stephen & Mary Smik; 5708 Mackenzie Road: <br />1. A 1,136 sq. ft. variance for an accessory storage building; code permits 400 sq. ft., <br />applicant shows 1,536 sq. ft., Section 1135.02(c)(2). <br />2. A 4 ft. 8 in. variance for the height of the accessory structure; code permits 14 ft., <br />applicant shows 18 ft. 8 in., Section 1135.02(c)(2). <br />Motion denied 4-0. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Mr. Mackey, to excuse the absence of Mr. Raig, motion <br />approved 4-0. <br />With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:24 p.m. <br />icole R bo-Ackerman, Administrative <br />Assistant <br />Approved: t4I Z? 14t