06/02/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2. A 155 foot variance for gt°ound sign too close together sign B west & sige A, (code requires 2001, applicant shows 45'), section (1163.26 (A)). 3. A 255 foot variance fer grouud sign to close together sfgn B east & sign A, (code requires 2001, applicant shows 451), section (1163.26 (A)). 4. A 71 square foat variance for a gronnd sign larger than permitted (sign B-2 west), (code permits 65 sq ft, applicant shows 136 sq ft), section (1163.26 (C'}). 5. A 71 sqnare foot eariance for a gronnd sigr? larger than permifted (sign B-2 east), (code permits 65 sq ft, applicant shows 136 sq ft), section (1163.26 (C)). 6. A 110 foot variana:e for gruund sign too clo5e (signs B east and B west), (code reqaum 200', applicant shows 90'), section (1163.26 (A)). 7. A 200 foot variance for grround signs too close (sign Bl - BZ east), (code requires 200', applicant shows 0% section (1163.86 (A)). 8. A 200 foot variance far gronnd signs goo close (sign Bl -B2 west), (code reqnu'es 200', applicant shows 0'), section (1163.26 (A)). Which is in vaolation of 90-125, Sections (1163.26 (A)) and (1163.26 (C)). The eariances granted are contingent npon futare walY signs being ciosest to code as possible and that no farther requests for ground signs are allowed on the prnperty/site. W. Kremzar seeonded the ffiotion, roll call os the ffiotioa, J. Maloney, W. Kremzar, T. Kelty "yes", M. D'nver "abstajned", and N. Sergi "no". Variances Granted as amended. Clerks Note: This reqnests firial approval was galaled at the 7/7l05 meeting. COMIlZU1vICATION: Commissioner's need to adclress Mr. & Mrs. Tench's Ietter petitioning the Board of 2oning Appeals Board reconsider their variance request of May 5, 2005. Mr. Tench, Mrs: Tench the awners and Mr. Puchmeyer, wrth Lighthouse Pools each caffie forwazd to discuss their request. 1V[rs. Diver inaicated that some of the lots meniioned in the Tench's Yetter have larger lots and some aYe two parceis next to each oiher and that is vvhy the board does not tatce other sifes gnto consideration when addressing a site. She did not feei it needed to be readdressed unless it was to decrease the size Qf the peol. Mr_ O'Matley indicated that he spoke to the Planning Director vho stated that she responded to the applicants request and in no way was it the clirectors intend to give an opinion, she was just providmg the requestecl information Mrs. Tench requested. Mrs. Sergi voiced f.hat she went to the site and measured out the request to get a better -understa,nding of the layout Mr. Puclmeyer believed that a smaller round pool would create more variances. Mr. & Mrs. Tench iaivited the board members to come to their home to see the stringed pool layout. J. Maloney ffioved ta grant ltiir. & Mm Tench of 24357 Woadmere DPive their reqaest for reconsideration and thear variance request wonld be readdressed at the Jnly 7, 2005 Board of Zoniag AppeaLs m?eeting. W. Ka'emzar seconded the axotion, rnll call on the motion, W. Kremzar, T. Kelty, N. Sergi, J. Maloney "yes", and M. Daver "na". Request Granted. JNlaloney moved to approve the Board of Zoning Appeah minntes dated May 5, 2QQ5 as writtea with the exception of case #3 Mr. & Mrs. Tench of 24357 VVoodanere Drive which was granted reeonsidetation. AI. Diver seconded the mation, wLich was, unanimonsty approved Mr. Malogey indaeated that applicaxats eon3inuously come forward saying that a Buildigg or Engineering departxnent inspector has told them that getting tfieir variances approved shottld 14 of 15