Laserfiche WebLink
therefore, there were not enough members to vote. He apologized to everyone present and <br />stated the request would be addressed at the August 4; 2005 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting <br />and notices would be sent out. <br />4. C& C Realtv; 27932 Lorain Road: (WRD 1) <br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of site development: <br />The following variances are requested: <br />l. A use variance for allowing parking & storage of vehicles for a car dealership on <br />residentially zoned land, (code permits none, applicant shows parking), section (1123.12). <br />Which is in violation of 90-125, Sections (1123.12), (1139.07) (table). Note: Board of Zoning <br />Appeals denied variance requests #3, #4, &#6, and granted requests #2, #5, &#8 at their <br />6/2/05. Due to photometric submitted at the 6/2/05 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting <br />variances #7 & #9 were withdrawn. <br />Due, to multiple conversations taking place the clerk asked for clarification. Mr. O'Malley <br />advised that Mr. Farrell requested that his clients use variance issue be tabled until all <br />members were present and for the board to address his reconsideration request slated at the <br />end of the docket at this time. Furthermore, if the reconsideration is granted that the <br />reconsideration be scheduled and addressed in conjunction with the use variance on August 4, <br />2005. Mr. Farrell stated he was requesting the use variance as well as the written request for <br />reconsideration both be tabled until the August 4, 2005 meeting. Due to the fact that his client <br />is at a disadvantage as only three members were present to vote on both issues. He voiced <br />that the outcome of the issues were detrimental to his client, therefore he would like to address <br />a full board. Mrs. Diver questioned if there would be something different. Mr. Farrell stated <br />there would be and as he presented a packet at the start of the meeting to each board member, <br />he understood that the board would need time to review the packet and absent members <br />needed to receive the packet. Mr. O'Malley advised that the only issue docketed was the use <br />variance and the board could grant the tabling of the use variance as a courtesy as there were <br />only three out of five members present. However, he would advise against tabling the <br />reconsideration, as it is listed as a communication before the minutes are adopted and a final <br />order is entered. Mr. Maloney stated the board would table the use variance and asked if the <br />applicant whished to move the request for reconsideration up the docket to be addressed. Mr. <br />Farrell answered "yes". <br />J. Maloney moved to reconsider C& C Realty of 27932 Lorain Road their request for <br />their variance requests from June 2, 2005 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting numbers #3, <br />#4, and #6 which were denied be reconsidered. W. Kremzar seconded the motion which <br />was unanimously approved. During roll call of the motion W. Kremzar stated it was <br />difficult not having an opportunity to read what was submitted therefore out of a <br />courtesy to the applicant he would be for the reconsideration. M. Diver concurred with <br />Mr. Kremzar's comment and hoped the applicant would stick to his word and show the <br />board something different. Reconsideration Granted <br />W. Kremzar moved to table C& C Realty of 27932 Lorain Road their request for a use <br />variance to the August 4, 2005 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. J. Maloney seconded <br />the motion which was unanimously approved. <br />5. B.A.D. Bovs Ltd; 28597 Lorain Road: (WRD 3) <br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a new development. <br />The following variances are requested: <br />4of13