07/07/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mrs. Murray the owner, Mr. Dever, a relative and the following neighbors; Mr. fairbairn, Mr. Meike each came forward to be sworn in and review the request. Mrs. Murray reviewed that at a previous Board of Zoning Appeals meeting she was denied a variance for her shed. Since that rneeting the shed was reduced to a 16 x 9 foot shed. The size of the shed was reduced by a total of 45%. Mr. Fairbairn .stated that the applicants have worked hard to improve their home and he was present to support his neighbor. Mr. Meike voiced that the shed would not be visible to any neighbors and had no objections. Boaxd members thanked the applicant for decreasing the size of shed and decreasing the variance request. W. Kremzar moved to grant Michael Murray of 26817 Sudbury Drive his request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a storage shed and that the following variance is granted: 1. A 35 square foot variance for a shed larger than the rear yard permits, (code permits 109 sq ft., applicant shows 144 sq ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90- 125 section (1135.02 D1). M. Diver seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. Variance Granted 7. Mr. & Mrs. Mason; 23236 Sharon Drive: (WRD 2) Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a new deck. The following variance is requested: 1. A variance for an accessory structure in rear yard, (code does not permit, applicant shows 326 sq ft. deck). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 DS). Note: Corner lot with cul-de-sac does not allow any structure in rear yard due to neighbors required 50' setback. Mr. & Mrs. Mason the owners came forward to be sworn in and address their request. Mr. Mason indicated that the deck would be 16 feet at the largest end decreasing to 10 and a 3rd foot squaring it of£ The deck is to accommodate patio furniture. He was not aware of the 50 foot setback requirement until he applied for the permit. The board questioned if the applicant planed to cover the deck. Mr. Mason stated that the deck would not be covered. W. Kremzar moved to grant Mr. & Mrs. Mason of 23236 Sharon Drive their request for variance A123.12), which consists of a new deck and that the following variance is granted: 14?A variance for an accessory structure in rear yard (code does not permit, applicant shows A326 sq ft. deck). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 DS). J. Maloney seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. 8. Kimberlv Botke; 28550 Hollv Drive: (WRD 3) Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of an addition. The following variances are requested: 1. An 18 foot variance for a residence too close to rear property line, (code requires 50', applicant shows 32'), section (1135.08 A). 2. A 16 square foot variance for accessory structures in rear yard, (code permits 512 sq ft, applicant shows 528 sq ft), section (1135.02 D2). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.08 A) and (1135.02 D2). Mr. Botke, the owner and the following neighbors; Mr. & Ms. Yasher, Ms. Nichols, Ms. Reynolds, Mr. Ellis, each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Mr. Botke would like a two bedroom addition for his growing family; his home abuts I- 480 and he owns 6of13