10/06/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

building. The 2 cunent signs which are already on the building and shown in the pictures face west into the parking-lot and are considerably smaller than what was allowed by code for 1 wall sign on the building. There is also one ground sign at the main entrance and that is what they would like to show the Boazd how the relationship of only having 1 curb cut and the placement of the future buildings affect their buildings vasibility. T'hey respectfully request the opportunity to continue the dialogue regarding signage. He advised that they would rather address the issue again with the Board of Zoning Appeals rather than go into litigation which would be the next procedural step if reconsideration was denied. He advised that they would answer any questions the Board may have. Mr. O'Malley advised that the matter before the Board was within the board's discretion and was neither a public hearing nor the time to hear testimony for or against the variance which was denied. The minutes of the meeting where the variance was denied once approved are in fact what constitutes the final written order of the board. The date of the fmal written order would be the date the minutes are determined and until those written orders are fmalized the 30 day appeal process does not start. Therefore this matter is between the applicant and board only and the applicants aze asking that you not approve your September l, 2005 minutes and allow them an opportunity to present the matter again at a public hearing. W. Krernzar moved to go into an ezecutive session for the purpose of discussing readdressing the applicant's request. N. Serga seconded the motion, roll call on the motion N. Sergi, T. Kelly, W. Kremzar, J. Maloney "yes" and M. Diver abstainedo Motion Passed J. 1Vialoney rnoved to return from ezecutive session to cantinue their proceedings. N. Sergi seconded the motion, roll call on the ffiotion; N. Sergi, T. Kelly, W. Kremzar, J. Maloney "yes" and M. Diver abstained. Motion Fassed 1VIrs. Sergi asked what dialogue the applicant wanted to address a change from what was presented. Mr. Rinker indicated that they would return to the next month with a different altemative to keep the lines of communication open to address the target logo only. The board advised that they did not want to hear the same argument that was already addressed. J. 1Vlaloney motioned to reconsider Target's request for reconsideration at the Board of Zoning Appeals meeting dated November 3, 2005. N. Sergi seconcleal the motion, roll call on the motion; N. Sergi, T. Kelly, W. Kreffizar, J.1Vlaloney "yes" and M. Diver abstained. IViotion Passed J. Maloney moved to table the September 1, 2005 nuinutes until the November 3, 2005 meeting. N. Sergi seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. Niinutes Tabled. 1!/Ir. O'Malley reviewed that at the September meeting the board requested the law department draft the findings for C& C Realiy and requested the clerk list out all items which were submitted for the case file in the body of the minutes. The fmdings have been submitted and the minutes were corrected to reflect the documents which were submitted or requested at the meetings. Mr. Maloney commented that he read the findings submitted and felt the findings to be accurate and true and felt they should be attached to the August 4, 2005 minutes. W. Kremzar moved to adopt the findings for C& C Itealty case file as written. J. Ma?oney seconded the motion wlnich was unanimously approved. W. Kremzar ffioved to have the August 4, 2005 miautes reflect the findings/order of the board. M. Diver seconded tbe motion wbich was unanimously approved. W. Kremzar moved to adopt the August 4, 2005 Board of Zoning Appeals minutes vvith the additeon of the findings/order. T. Kelly seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. J. Maloney motion to table September 1, 2005 Board of Zoning Appeals minutes until meeting nezt. N. Sergi seconeied the motion which was unanimously approved. Mr. O'Malley requested the board address the Septeanber 9, 2005 correspondence next as the court reporter was present to transcribe all proceedirags pertaining to the C& C Realty matter. 5 of 7