Laserfiche WebLink
I until the minutes a.re approved. Therefore he would like to request that somewhere in the regulations it <br />clearly state a definition as to what the affective date is. When can an applicant begin their work? <br />Furthertnore, that affective date which is determined is the beginning of the 30-day period for which <br />Council has to review it that, that also be indicated on the approval form that an applicant receives. At <br />this time applicants have no way of knowing when they can start work. There needs to be clearer <br />defmitions and he believed that it could be addressed under the Boazd of Zoning Appeals rules. <br />Mr. O'Malley advised that although the Board of Zoning Appeals is creating their rules anything within <br />those rules which are not consistent with the Codified Ordinances, which is possible it should be clear <br />that the North Olmsted Codified Codes governs. Nothing within the boards rules sugersede the <br />codified codes. The building department issues building permits as soon as reasonably possible once a <br />decision is rendered by the board. City Council who created the Board of Zoning Appeals has <br />restricted the board's authority and even requires in some instances that they are to review <br />determinations made by the Board of Zoning Appeals. He belaeves that Mr. Burns's suggestion has <br />merit and deserves cQnsideration. <br />Mrs. Diver questioned what incident would go to Council for review. Mr. O'Malley advised that the <br />issue was being looked into and he was not sure if it was within the board's powers to address Mr. <br />Burais's issue. Mr. Burns uaiderstood there had to be discussions regarding the methods of notifications <br />asid other issues but all he is asking is that during the process those dates get defined so applicants have <br />a clear understanding af when they can start work. <br />Mr. Burns questioned why under section 5 item 1 is an applicant's request for withdrawal subject to the <br />boards' approval. Ivlr. O'Malley reviewed that that topic was due to applicant's last aninute or day of <br />scheduled meeting requesting to be tabled. Any applicant can withdrawal their application outright <br />until they come before the board to plead their case. However, once an applicant is before the board the <br />board has the right to a11ow the applicants to withdraw or table themselves but the board can also deny a <br />request to withdPaw and conclude the case. Mr. Burns suggested that language be added that the <br />applicants can not withdrawal a proposal without the boards' approval if the deliberation has started but <br />any time before that they can withdrawal. Mr. O'Malley belieeed the wording was fine as it was <br />written. <br />W. Kremzar ffioved to accept the rnles of procedures as amendecl. M. Diver seconded the motion <br />which vvas unanimously approved. <br />V. ADJOURNMENT: <br />With no further business pending Chauman Maloney adjourned the meeting at 10:30 pm. <br />? <br />Maloney Chairanan % ate: onna Rote Clerk <br />7of7