My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/25/2005 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2005
>
2005 Planning Commission
>
01/25/2005 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:46:18 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 3:50:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2005
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
J. Lasko moved to forward this matter onto Board of Zoning Appeals with the following <br />recommendations pertaining to items 9 and 10 as indicated on the revised variances sheet <br />dated 1/25/05 whereby we recommend that a variance be granted pertaining to item #10 for <br />two ground signs on this particular lot with the condition that item #9 either would be <br />withdrawn or if it is not withdrawn, that vve recommend that it be denied pertaining to <br />three wall signs on the building. T. Hreha seconded, which was unanimously approved. <br />J. Lasko moved to forward this matter to Board of Zoning Appeals with the following <br />recommendations pertaining to item #8 on the list of revised variances sheet dated 1/25/05 <br />pertaining to item #8 and that request for a variance be denied as written on the plans that <br />exist, however, subject to appropriate revision of the lighting design as well as the provision <br />of mounding along the north end of the property and revised landscaping in the 20' area on <br />the eastern exposure of the property on Porter Road between the proposed new concrete <br />apron on the northern property line that, if fact, if those particular items come back to our <br />approval based upon the recommendations that we have discussed here today, then further <br />consideration would then be given. However, as it exists today, the recommendation is <br />denied variance #8. T. Hreha seconded, which was unanimously approved. <br />These matters are contingent that the applicant follows through on the consolidation of the <br />parcels that are being discussed here this evening. R. Koeth second, which was <br />unanimously approved. <br />J. Lasko said this needs to be forwarded onto Landmarks Commission for their input and <br />advice. Pending that, they will be returning to this Board once the other bodies have been <br />determined. <br />VII. COMMITTEE REPORTS: <br />Ms. Wenger requested the members of the Commission to review the Charter Review <br />Commission memo they had previously received regarding input on potential Charter <br />amendments. Although she had created her own recommendations, she would like contribution <br />from the Planning Commission as well. She also indicated this opportunity does not come <br />around often and asked that the Board get together and commit themselves to talk about it. Ms. <br />Wenger asked that one member be assigned to accept all comments from the other members. <br />Chairman Koeth asked that all comments be sent to him and he will forward the <br />recommendations on. Chairman Koeth asked that everybody be prepared with comments for the <br />February 8th meeting. <br />b, Secretary <br />VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.