01/25/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

D) Existing mechanical unit be painted to match the roof. In addition, the board asked the applicant if they were making any further site improvements. Suggested was the addition of landscaping and a sidewalk along Brookpark Road. The applicant indicated that they rent the property and need to check with the landlord. Ms. Wenger indicated that this applicant currently shares a parcel with the vacant Mountain Jack's structure that is located to north which is owned by Columbia Land Development Company. While they are leased separately for tax purposes, the parcel has not been formerly split or recorded by the City or County. In December 2004, the City met with representatives from Columbia Land Development and a potential tenant to discuss the vacant portion of land. A future tenant, Chick-Fil A, is moving forward with a site survey and a developmental proposal. The proposal by Conrad's is for building modifications only, however, it is likely that with the upcoming development proposal, additional improvements would be needed for the entire parcel. Ms. Wenger recommended that Planning Commission hold its review of the building modifications until such time as a more comprehensive proposal can be evaluated. Ms. Wenger contacted Mr. Duda today to inform him of her recommendation. Ms. Hoff-Smith asked what the time frame is for this. Ms. Wenger said it would be in a few weeks, but the applicant has yet to formally apply. Steve Miller from Archer Signs came forward. He wanted to relay to the Board that he is worlcing with the landlord trying to work out site improvements for green space. Mr. O'Malley suggested that the landlord, tenant, engineer and landscape architect should go to the drawing board and come as team and consider what is happening on the neighboring site, instead of just sending a representative for the sign company because it is a comprehensive site development plan. Mr. Yager aslced for photographs of other locations. Mr. Koeth asked Mr. Miller if he would relay those comments to Mr. Duda. He provided Mr. Miller with notes from Architectural Review Board. IVIr. Koeth moved to table Conrad's with those recommendations and return when the landscaper and landlord are ready with the comprehensive plan. 1VIr. Yager seconded the motion, which dvas unanimously approved. Laketec Communications: (PP #235-07-009, O10), 27881 Lorain Road (WRD 3): Proposal consists of modification to site lighting. Ms. Wenger said Laketec Communications appeared before the Planning Commission on April 27, 2004 and their proposal consisted of site improvements, including a new entrance, canopy, landscaping, fencing and other improvements. They also received variances from the BZA to permit car storage, signage and encroachment on the front setback. It was approved by Planning Commission and City Council and since approval, the applicant has replaced four light fixtures on the premises, however, they do not meet required zoning requirements and, therefore, require two variances which Mr. Conway then addressed. He said the lights are not a full cut off fixture, nor, is the distance from property lines appropriate. The applicant installed decorative fixtures