01/25/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

J. Lasko moved that the Flanning CoYnmission recommend approval for a variance in relation to the outdoor lighting fixtures, not being a full cut off vahich would otherwise be required as well as for a 6" variance pertaining to the height of the concrete pedestal for the light post. M. Yager seconded, which was unanimously approved. OLD BUSINESS: Shadow Wood (Bradlev laoad Cluster, 30898 Bradlev Road: (WRD 3): Proposal consists of the construction of a single family cluster home development: Note: Architectural Review Board addressed this proposal on 7/21/04, 9/22/04 and 1/19/05. Planning Commission tabled this proposal on 9/28/04, 10/12/04 and 12/14/04. Ms. Wenger said that the Planning Commission previously approved the applicant's request to rezone their property from light industrial to single family cluster contingent upon development approval. The applicant is returning to the Planning Commission tonight after being tabled at the December 14, 2004 meeting. At that time, the Commission's recommendations included: • Relocating manholes #7 and #8 farther south to make the buffer along Bradley Woods as large as possible. • Show the drive in concrete as opposed to asphalt. • Show sidewalks are on both sides of the street. • Show the curbs as straight curbs rather than rolled. • Show the proposed lighting scheme for the development. Elevations - Elevations have been submitted. No changes have been requested or made. Landscaping & Screening - Landscape plans have been submitted; however, they have not been revised to reflect the current site and grading plan. The Engineering Department has identified an issue where two landscaping beds closest to French Creek are located within detention basins. I recommend that this landscape area be relocated outside of the detention area and/or provide landscaping at the top of the banlc where it would not interfere with drainage capacity. Access, Circulation & Parking - Plans now show one location for connection to a possible future expansion area. In previous plans, a second access location was shown in conjunction with the Phase 1 turnaround area. However, this connection was eliminated when the applicant indicated that there would not be phases to the project. There has been discussion as to whether the City's subdivision regulations are all relevant to a cluster development. The Building and Engineering Departments have taken different positions on this issue. The sidewalk issue is one example. Lightin - Planning Commission requested that plans of the proposed lighting scheme be submitted for review. The applicant has not submitted revised cut sheets of light fixtures to be used.