Laserfiche WebLink
` CITY OF 1VORTH OLMSTED <br />The Board's deliberation and vote did not directly address item 7 as the applicant withdrew the <br />request. Items 8, 10, 11, and 12 were not addressed clirectly by vote but considered moot by the <br />denial of the Special Permit and the denial of a variance to expand a noneonforming building. <br />Accordingly, based on the substamtial, probative and reliable evidence on the record, and as <br />governed by application of the foregoing standards, and further subject to the conditions, the <br />variance is hereby: <br />? GI2ANTED I)ENIED <br />: <br />?i ? a <br />Board of ing' ppe hai an E ate <br />ZZC-, <br />lerlc of Commissions Date <br />Zl/Z"-1e1 7 <br />Date mailed to applicant <br />AREA VARdANCE S7'ANDAdlDS: <br />1. Can the property yield a reasonable return or can there be any beneficial use of the property <br />without the variance? <br />2. Is the variance substantial? <br />3. Will tlie essential character of the neighborhood be substantially altered or will adjoining properties <br />suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance? <br />4. Will the variance adversely affect the delivery of governmental services (e.g. water, sewer, <br />garbage)? <br />5. Did the property owner purchase the property with lcnowledge of the zoning restriction? <br />6. Can the property owner's predicament be precluded through some method other than a variance? <br />7. Would tlie spirit and intent behind the zoning requirement be observed and substantial justice done <br />by granting the variance? <br />5200 Dover Center Road, North Olmsted, Ohio 44070 - Phone: (440) 716-4134 - Fax: (440) 777-5889 <br />RoteD@north-olmsted.com - www.north-olmsted.com