07/12/2007 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• a , N. Sergi moved to approve Teresa Mills of 27974 Terrace Drive her request for variance (1123,12) which consists of a landscaping screen walUtrellis and the following variance is granted: A 10.5 foot variance for an accessory structure (screen wall) in 50' front setback, (code requires 501, applicant shows 39.0'). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (fl)). R. Menser seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. 2. J. Tackett & D. Webb; 29550 Broxbourne Road (WRD # 3) Requesti for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a shedlbarn and the following variance is requested: 1. A 120 square foot variance for storage shed larger than code allows, (code permits 120 sq ft, applicant shows 240 sq ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135:02 (D1)). Mr. & Mrs. Tackett each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Mrs. Tackett said they would like to be allowed a 12' x 20' barn in lieu of the 10' x 10' which is allowed by code. They added an addition which eliminated 5 feet of the garage to accommodate her mother moving into their home to be cared for. The garage can no longer accommodate their yard equipment. A brochure was presented of the type of barn to be constructed as well as photos of the garage and yard equipment. Mrs. Diver questioned if the home abutted the metro parks and is located on a dead-end street. Mrs. Tackett indicated she was correct. Mrs. Sergi reviewed that although the variance is substantial the depth and location of the property could accommodate the barri. The barn would not be visible to neighbors and the character would not be altered nor would governmental services be affected. Mr. Conway said that the circumstances of the lot lessori'the impact of the variance requested. Mr. Kelly arrived to the meeting. Mrs. Sergi said the request is double what is allowed by code. 1VIrs. Tackett presented a brochure of the shed as well as photos showing the garden tools and garage. The board discussed the size and location of the sheds placement. Mrs. Diver did not believe the neighborhood would be altered nor the governmental service affected. If the garage was altered to get back the space lost it too would require variances. Mrs. Sergi felt that the spirit and intent of the code would be met granting the variarice. N..Sergi moved to approve J. Tackett & D. Webb of 29550 Broxbourne Road their request for variance (1123.12) which consists of a shed/barn and the following variance is granted: A 120 square foot variance for a storage shed larger than code allows, (code permits 120 sq ft, applieant shows 240 sq ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (1)1)). A. Williamson seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. 3. Tim Edman; 24356 Maria Lane: (WRD # 2) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a porch and the following variance is requested: 1. A 4.5 foot variance for a residence location within 50' front setback, (Code requires 50', applicant shows 45.5'). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.06 (a)). Ms. Edman the owner and Mrs. Harmon a neighbor each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Mrs. Edman said that she would just like to have a roof over the existing porcli to provide shade. The porch was built two years ago and the new roof will have the same pitcli`as'the homes roof. The roof will improve the appearance of the home and raise its value as well. A computer drawing was presented to show how the porch would look with the roof on. Mr. Conway did not think the request was significant nor would it have an adverse affect on the area. Mrs. Sergi asked if the stairs would be covered and felt the character of the neighborhood would be altered as there are no other lots with covered porches. Governmental services would not be affected nor is the request substantial. Mr. Menser felt that due to the neighborhood being 2