Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Liggett said the applicant would be willing to move the structure to a vacant lot five doors <br />down which is owned by the City. This would keep the structure in the district and closer to the <br />farm house. <br />Mr. Ligget said he also redesigned units 1-3 in the style of the existing home. Windows are in a <br />neocolonial style with shutters, a gable ended house, cottage style garage door. The front door <br />has a pediment and framing columns that wrap around the porch as well as an accent light. The <br />gable end structure is going to be the main feature. The home is set back with the park like <br />atmosphere in front. The group feels that they have fully assessed the Bradford home and the <br />property. <br />Ms. Wenger noted that moving the Bradford home to an empty lot would require the city's <br />approval and a commitment to its maintenance requirements. Mr. O'Malley noted that the plans <br />were not subinitted before the meeting, the Commission should consider having some time to <br />review the new plans. Mr. Liggett stated that the letter from Mr. McQuillin was not received <br />until the last minute, which gave them no time to submit new plans. <br />Mr. Schock moved to recess the meeting, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, which was <br />unanimously approvecl, 7-0. <br />The Commission recessed for 15 minutes. After the recess Mr. Schumann invited the members <br />of the public to speak. <br />John Martindale of 26031 Butternut Ridge stated that the architect's view reflected the class <br />structure of the home as opposed to the actual worth of the district. He believes they are <br />overloolcing the real historical value and the effect of its removal on the district. <br />Bob Sharp of 25407 Butternut Ridge feels that the development does not reflect the character of <br />the district. It is a residential area that should not be rezoned for development. He is concerned <br />that should it move forward it will set a precedent and the character of Butternut Ridge will be <br />eliminated. <br />Aileen Toth of 25717 Butternut Ridge stated her property was purchased in 1953. She noted the <br />Bradford home was on a tour through century homes in the 1970's. It was considered a century <br />home and received a plaque. There is 150 foot frontage on the Bradford home and she requests <br />and the current plans appear to be moving into her property. She requests that they move their <br />driveway in for the development. <br />Brian Gorris of 25845 Butternut Ridge noted that the rezoning cannot be addressed however <br />small changes need to be approved by the Commission. He felt that the Commission needs to <br />show that it is not in the best interest of the city of North Olmsted. <br />Ed Wiles of 25746 Butternut Ridge felt that preserving and protecting Butternut Ridge should be <br />considered first.