Laserfiche WebLink
would not be affected. Her only concern was that there would be no handicap ramp for <br />emergencies. Mrs. Diver did not feel the request was substantial or detrimental to neighbors'. <br />Mrs. Sergi moved seconded by 10'Is. Rudolph, to grant Jeryl Bradesca of 24885 Antler Drive <br />her request for variance (1123.12) which consists of a front porch and the following <br />variance is granted: A 7 foot front yard setback variance for a residence too close to the <br />right of way (code requires 501, applicant shows 43'). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 <br />section (1135.06 (a)), which vvas unanimously approved 5-0. <br />NON-RESIDENTIAL APPEAI..S AND REQUESTS: <br />COMS07-0016: Clark Gas Station; 28925 Lorain Road: (VVarci 3) <br />• A special permit to add to a non-conforming building (1165.02). <br />• A variance for section (1165.02) as the addition does not comply with front and rear <br />setbaclcs. <br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of signage and redeveloping the site. <br />The following variances are requested: <br />8. A variance for 1 parking spaces, (code requires 5, applicant shows 4), section (1161.04 (b)). <br />Note: Handicap is not striped for vans; also handicap space and one space blocks propane <br />tank sales. <br />10. A 1 foot 6 inch variance for front yard setback (due to roof projection), (code requires 75 ft, <br />applicant shows 73'6"), section (table 1139.07). <br />11. A 20 foot variance for rear yard setback, (code requires 25 ft applicant shows 5 ft), section <br />(1139.07). <br />12. A 2 foot 6 inch side yard variance to parking, (code requires 10 ft applicant shows 7'6") <br />section (1139.07). <br />13. A 4% variance for exceeding lot coverage (code permits 25% applicant shows 29%), section <br />(1139.05). <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections; (1161.04 (b)), (table 1139.07) and (1139.05). <br />Mr. Manning the applicants' Attorney and Mr. Smith the Architect each came forward to be <br />sworn in and address the board. Mr. Manning reviewed that the proj ect was on going for the past <br />year. The site needs to be improved due to customer needs and the profit margin on the sales of <br />gas being decreased. The owner wants to offer more than vending machines to be competitive <br />and add an additional gas-pump to stay in business. In the process of improving the site they <br />have tried to meet all the cities requests and respectfully full fill the needs of both the owner and <br />city. The variances listed are what are needed to help the owner stay in business and compete <br />with surrounding businesses. To date no neighbors have come forward to object to what is <br />talcing place and although Ward 3 Councilwoman Jones advised that she would not address the <br />board she acknowledges the site needed to be improved. After BZA granted reconsideration <br />they had two meetings with city staff to work out what would be reasonable or acceptable for the <br />lot size and shape. The size of the addition was decreased, the ground sign was eliminated and a <br />number of variances were decreased or eliminated. <br />The lot requires a special permit to add to a nonconforming building, front rear, sideyard and lot <br />coverage variances each of which were decreased. The nature of the business will remain the <br />same therefore the enhancements will improve the neighborhood. The use and value would not <br />be adversely affected as the improvements will in fact increase the value of the owners and <br />neighboring sites. There will be no public nuisance as the neighboring sites are commercial and <br />the use is preexisting. Traffic congestion will be improved as the additional pump will move <br />2