Laserfiche WebLink
would not be affected and there is no other method other than seeking a variance or purchasing <br />additional land. Mrs. Sergi and Mrs. Bellido felt that it would not be in the board's best interest <br />to deny the variance for the existing driveway width regardless of the request to split the lot is a <br />preexisting condition. Mrs. Diver felt that the variance was warranted as there was no other <br />method than a variance. <br />Mrs. Sergi moved, seconded by 1VIs. Rudolph, to grant C1VIS09-02: Lot Split of PPN 237- <br />25-008 of 23865 Mastick Road a 51.65 foot variance for lot width of parcel "B", code <br />requires 80 ft, applicant shows 28.35 ft, which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section 1135.05 <br />and was unanimously approvecl 4-0. The clerlc advised that the applicants would be going <br />before the Planning & Design Commission on February 11, 2009 and that although notices were <br />already released she would add the additional contacts submitted and reissue the notice. <br />COMMUNICATIOIVS <br />Mrs. Diver said the board was invited to attend a web conference to be held in Council Chambers <br />Wednesday, February 18, 2009 which she hoped everyone could attend. <br />Mrs. Diver said that the board received the e-mail that was sent to the.Planning & Design <br />Commission from a board member and a brief discussion ensued pertaining to addressing topics <br />as a combined board rather than individually. Members questioned how they could address <br />possible suggestions for changes in the zoning code and Mr. O'Malley said the board could <br />address the zoning concerns and petition the Planning and Building Department to research and <br />address the boards concerns but the board needed to exercise caution when speaking out on <br />topics they address. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />The meeting was adj - urned at 8:40 pm. <br />N?tireen Diver, Chair <br />i <br />Do` a Rote, Clerlc of Commissions <br />c 3 <br />Approved: