Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF BUILDING CODE APPEALS <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MIliTUTES FOR MAY 20, 2010 <br />ROLL CALL <br />The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. in Council Chambers. <br />Present: Donna Sabo, Norman Althen, Dan Jarachovic <br />Absent: Robert Lipcsey, BJ Meder <br />Staff: Assistant Law Director Bryan O'Malley, Building Commissioner Dale Mitchell, <br />Clerlc of Commissions Donna Rote <br />REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES <br />Mr. Jarachovic moved, seconded by Mr. Althen to approve the December 17, 2009 minutes <br />which was approved 3-0. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />Antliony & Rosemarv Hurst; 2845 Walter Road: <br />Request consists of installing a HVAC condensing unit, which was tabled until June 17, 2010. <br />Gail Pirtle; 5096 Whitethorn Ave: <br />Request consists of installing a HVAC condensing unit, which was tabled until June 17, 2010. <br />Christopher & Julie Pencal{; 4538 Kew Drive: <br />Request consists of a non-conforming fence along the rear property line. The request is for a <br />variance for a 72-foot section of fencing along the rear property line where a fence is already <br />installed along a property line, an additional fence will not be permitted; Section 1369.03(a)(3). <br />Mrs. Rodriguez, the applicant's daughter, appeared to represent her parents. Mr. O'Malley <br />advised the board that she could not represent her parents as she did not live in their home nor <br />was she a resident of the city. However the board's rules provide the board the option of <br />addressing the case without the owner's presence. Mrs. Kappus, a neighbor, aslced what was <br />being requested as there were already three fences around the applicant's property. Mr. Mitchell <br />explained the site plan and the applicant's request. Mrs. Kappus said she was concerned that <br />once the fence was installed the area would not be maintained and would be a hang out for <br />neighboring lcids. Mr. Mitchell said the owner was providing two gates which would allow <br />access to the area for maintenance. Mr. Kappus aslced if the easement area was required to <br />remain open or could the area be closed. Mr. Mitchell said both properties have 4-foot CEI <br />easements which must reinain open, plus an additional 1-foot is required for installing the fence <br />and posts. Mr. Jarachovic raised the safety issues and Mrs. Rodriguez explained that her parents <br />watch her child and the neighbor's dog gets out and they are concerned. Mrs. Kappus said she <br />could attest to the dog getting out as she has called the police on the dog a few times. Mrs. Sabo <br />questioned the gate's location and Mrs. Rodriguez said there would be a 4-foot wide gate along <br />the rear property line as well as one along the side of the home.