My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/06/2011 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2011
>
2011 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
10/06/2011 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:33 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 7:35:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2011
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/6/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Her condition restricts her from maneuvering stairs which is also in his home so a room and <br />bathroom is being added. Ms. Scebbie said the addition would not be any wider than the home. <br />Mr. Mitchell noted that the pool was installed without a permit and said if it was being relocated <br />a permit is required as are inspections. Mr. Lyons said they may or may not reinstall the pool <br />once it is moved and said permits would be pulled if it was. The pool was in place when he <br />purchased the home. Mr. Gareau advised that once the pool is removed the owner may not erect <br />it again unless proper permits and inspections are completed regardless of the size or prior <br />history. Ms. Rudolph aslced if the existing deck and pool would be reinstalled. Mr. Lyons said <br />after the addition is completed they would consider it and said permits would be pulled for any <br />worlc done. <br />Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Ms. Bellido, to grant Thomas Lyons of 6672 Cypress <br />Drive a 15 foot variance for rear yard setbaclc for a home addition; code requires 50 feet, <br />applicant shows 35 feet, Section 1135.08(a), which passed 5-0. <br />Beniamin T. Wollenburg; 4343 Root Road <br />Proposal consists of an addition to a detached garage. The following variance is requested: <br />1. A 630 square foot variance for detached garage larger than code allows; code permits 750 sq <br />ft, applicant shows 1,380 sq ft, Section 1135.02(c)(1). <br />Mr. Wollenburg and Ms. Arebalo were sworn in. Mr. Wollenburg said he built a boat which he <br />would like to store in his garage. The addition will be to the baclc of the existing garage and <br />would allow full use of their garage. Photos of the site were submitted showing the size of the <br />lot and layout of existing garage. Mr. Mitchell said that the lot was quite large and could <br />accommodate the addition requested. It would not be visible from the front and would not <br />change the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Wollenburg said the addition would be 22' x 26' <br />and meet all setback requirements. Ms. Diver asked if there would be a driveway included with <br />the addition and Mr. Wollenburg said there would be no driveway to the addition. Due to the <br />size of the lot and the addition not being visible from the street the board had no objections. <br />Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Ms. Diver, to grant Benjarr?in T. Wollenburg of 4343 <br />Root Road a 630 square foot variance for detached garage larger than code allows; code <br />permits 750 sq ft, applicant shows 1,380 sq ft, Section 1135.02(c)(1), which passed 5-0. <br />COMMERCIAL APPEALS AND REQUESTS <br />Kev Bank; 26380 Great Northern ShoAping Center <br />Proposal consists of signage. The following variance is requested: <br />1. A variance for one (1) additional ground sign on a lot; code permits two (2), applicant shows <br />four (4), Section 1163.27(a). Note: A variance was previously granted for one additional <br />ground sign on a lot. A variance for three (3) walls signs was granted on 8/7/07. A square <br />foot request was denied. Wall signs must not exceed 96 square feet for building. <br />Mr. Harrison with Brilliant Electric Sign Company was sworn in. Ms. Sergi questioned the <br />owner's absence and asked if owner permission was received for the applicant to represent them. <br />Mr. Gareau advised that it was at the discretion of the board if they wished to allow the applicant <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.