Laserfiche WebLink
:+ <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />PLANNING COMIVIISSION <br />MIlVUTES - FEBRUARY 10, 1998 <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Present: R. Tallon, R. Koeth, T. Brennan, S. Assef? and D. Cameron-Alston. <br />, <br />Absent: A Mawiiu.g and K O'Rourke. <br />Also present: City Engineer Deichmann, Assistant Law Director Dubelko, Assistant Building <br />Commissioner Rymarczyk, and Assistant Clerk of Commissions Cornish <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MIlgUTES: <br />R. Tallon motioned to approve the minutes of December 9, 1997, seconded by T. Brennan. Roll <br />call on motion: Tallon, Brennan, Assefl? and Cameron-Alston, yes. Mr. Koeth abstained. <br />III. BUII..DING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br />1) C.V.S. Pharmacy, 23359 Lorain Road. Proposal to construct pharmacy in front of existiug Goodwill and Hobby's, Etc. units (the existing <br />center will be demolished). Variances may be required. Continued from meeting of January 13, <br />1998 and January 27, 1998. <br />Mr. Wagner, developer, advised at tlie last meeting there were two issues including the covered <br />ditch on the southem end of the property and the photometric study. He noted the site plan has <br />been revised, and the plau submitted to the city February 9, 1998, includes the recommendations <br />of the city's engineering department as noted in a memorandum dated 7anuary 29, 1998. In <br />addition, a revised photometric plan was presented on January 6, 1998, and the lighting has been <br />reduced to zero or near zero at the lot line, the pole heights have been reduced, and a cut of the <br />light and pole was presented. Mr. Wagner explained the light wattage reduction was not <br />necessary as illustrated by the photometric plan. The commission reviewed the photometric plan. <br />Mr. Wagner noted the location of the florescent lights. Mr. Tallon advised the lighting should not <br />glare out from the building, and stated any lighting along the southern property line should be <br />down lighting. Mr. Brennan questioned if the florescent lights would shine down and if they <br />would be an alcove. Mr. Wagner confirmed that was the intention. Mr. Asseff cautioned the <br />lighting should not be high intensity d.ischarge. Mr. Wagner explained the light poles would be 20 <br />feet from the grouud to the bottom of the fixture. Mr. Tallon suggested a flat fixttue so that the <br />bulb is up inside the fixture and there is no glare. Mr. Wagner agreed to use a flat lens. In <br />response to a question from Mr. Tallon, W. Wagner advised they would use 400 watt metal <br />halide bulbs. On the rear fixtures, Mr. Tallon suggested lowering the bulb wattage on the rear of <br />the buildings which abut the residential areas. Mr. Rymarczyk advised this proposal has not yet <br />been heard by the architectural review board. In response to a question from Mr. Tallon, the <br />clerk advised the next architectural review board meeting is February 18, 1998. Mr. Tallou <br />opened the meeting up for audience participation. Councilman Michael Gareau Jr. had concerns <br />regarding the fence. He requested that the fence ruu from the east side of the new headwall, west <br />till it is 30 feet from Clague Road. It was noted the fence is broken up by landscaping, and W. <br />Gareau would like to see the fence run almost the entire length of the southern property line. W.