My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/09/1999 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission
>
11/09/1999 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:56 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 3:38:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1999
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
11/9/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
•r <br />r <br />complete design can not be drawn up. An audience member asked why RTA had not done a <br />survey yet. Ms. Feke remarked that she could not access the land or attempt to purchase the land <br />because it had not been rezoned yet. She can not go to a 100% drawing without an accurate <br />survey of the land. RTA will do what ever is required of them and RTA knows that it will be the <br />most expensive park and ride they have ever built. Again at this point audience members were <br />speaking all at once and the discussion was not audible. Mr. Tallon had to use the gavel to get <br />the meeting back in order. Ms. Pattan suggested that the residents don't need a surveyor to let, <br />you know that their property value will go down. They are talking about lowering the land and <br />raising the mounds which will not make a difference, her home is currently 40 feet above 1480 and <br />they hear every car that goes by and now we will have to hear buses and cars 200 feet from our <br />home. The mounds will not keep the fumes or noise from reaching our homes. Mr. Bosl a <br />resident questioned if the 5 parcels listed in ordinance 99-140 were the only parcels that RTA will <br />be using for the park and ride. He questioned the if the criteria for the overlay zoning would have <br />a separate criteria's made for that zone. Mr. Dubelko stated that there would be a separate <br />chapter in the zoning codebook providing for the restrictions of uses in that district. The question <br />that comes into mind is the potential conflict between restrictions that are imposed by overlay <br />verse restrictions that are imposed by the underlining zoning resideritial; the more severe <br />restriction would apply. Mr. Bosl suggested that the overlay ordinance has its own criteria as <br />does the communications overlay ordinance that was mentioned earlier. Mr. Dubelko commented <br />` that was correct' and reviewed the basic zoning requirements that are found in zoning chapters. <br />When a specific proposal for land zoned in one of the those chapters comes before the. Planning <br />Commission, the first thing the code says it that it has to meet the code minimums before it can go <br />before the Boards and Commissions. The Planning Commission then has to look as adverse <br />impacts such as esthetics and safety. Mr. Bosal questioned if the value of the property going <br />down could be requested. Before the ordinance is put in place is there studies done with respect <br />to air pollution and noise pollution to find out what the adverse effects would be. Mr. Dubelko <br />indicated that typically the studies are made by some professionals within the city. A development <br />proposal is sent on to the Safety forces to look at potential problems such as traffic impact, the <br />forester with respect on trees that would be removed or replaced, to the Engineering Department <br />to review engineering issues. The plans are sent on to the Architectural Review Board for <br />recommendations of styles, colors and material used. The Planning Commission typically gets a <br />proposal first then it is sent with recommendations on to other city bodies to review. One <br />ordinance which covers super stores the developer has to do a traffic study because of the traffic <br />increase, but typically on development proposals things are done in house by city people. The <br />Plarming Commission makes suggested changes based upon the recommendations of the other <br />City bodies and officials. The Planning Commission itself is a recommending body that <br />recommends it on to Council for final approval. Mr. Bosal suggested that the Assistant Law <br />Director was basically saying there are no comparison studies for what is now and what will be <br />later to avoid adverse affects on the property. Mr. Bohlmann suggested that if the residents <br />looked at what the property was currently zoned at it has the least amount of adverse impact for <br />that area. He thinks it is far to say that no one is going to build a home on that property. What <br />else would have the least amount of impact on this area, a park and ride, general retail, an office <br />building, hotel, or apartments they are not sure. The least amount of impact on the neighborhood <br />he would think that would be a park and ride. The city can only address certain things in an <br />ordinance such as setbacks, roof height requirement things of that nature. Issues regarding <br />13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.